Judges Act Article 61
A party may file a petition for a retrial when not being satisfied with the final and binding judgment rendered by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Judiciary under any of the following circumstances unless the party has filed an appeal to assert the cause or has failed to assert such cause known to him/her: 1. The application of the law is evidently erroneous.2. The Disciplinary Chamber of the Judiciary that renders the judgment concerned is not organized in conformity with the law.3. The judge or Expert Lay Judge who should have rescued him/herself in accordance with the law or adjudication has participated in the trial.4. The judge or Expert Lay Judge participating in the adjudication is proven to have committed a criminal offense in violation of his/her duties, or the disciplinary disposition he/she received due to his/her violation of duties in the adjudication thereof is sufficient to affect the original judgment.5. The testimony, expert opinion, translation, or exhibit that serves as the basis for the original judgment has been proved to be false, forged, or altered.6. Failure to consider the critical exhibit sufficient to affect the original judgment.7. Discovery of concrete and fresh evidence sufficient to warrant the change of the original judgment.8. The act has been subsequently rendered with the disposition of non-prosecution for the same act, or the civil or criminal judgment and other adjudication or administrative disposition serving as the basis of the judgment concerned have been amended according to the subsequent final and binding judgment or administrative disposition. 9. The law or regulation being applied in the final and binding judgment is, upon the motion of the party, interpreted to be unconstitutional by the Justices of the Judicial Yuan.A petition for a retrial may be filed under the manifestation of circumstances in Subparagraphs 4 and 5 of the preceding paragraph, provided that they shall be limited to cases with the final and binding judgment, or the criminal proceeding of such cases that cannot be initiated or continued is due to reasons other than lack of sufficient evidence.If the person subject to the judgment has died after the judgment becomes final and binding, his/her spouse, direct blood relatives, collateral blood relatives within the third degrees, in-laws within the second degrees, parents, or family members may file a retrial in favor of the person subject to the judgment.A petition for a retrial may nevertheless be filed even after the enforcement of the original judgment is completed.
中文原文 法官法第61條
有下列各款情形之一者，當事人得提起再審之訴，對於確定終局判決聲明不服。
但當事人已依上訴主張其事由或知其事由而不為主張者，不在此限：
一、適用法規顯有錯誤。
二、判決職務法庭之組織不合法。
三、依法律或裁定應迴避之法官、參審員參與審判。
四、參與裁判之法官或參審員關於該訴訟違背職務，犯刑事上之罪已經證明，或關於該訴訟違背職務受懲戒處分，足以影響原判決。
五、原判決所憑之證言、鑑定、通譯或證物，已證明係虛偽或偽造、變造。
六、原判決就足以影響於判決之重要證物漏未斟酌。
七、發現確實之新證據，足認應變更原判決。
八、同一行為其後經不起訴處分確定，或為判決基礎之民事或刑事判決及其他裁判或行政處分，依其後之確定裁判或行政處分已變更。
九、確定終局判決所適用之法律或命令，經司法院大法官依當事人之聲請，解釋為牴觸憲法。
前項第四款及第五款情形之證明，以經判決確定，或其刑事訴訟不能開始或續行非因證據不足者為限，得提起再審之訴。
判決確定後受判決人已死亡者，其配偶、直系血親、三親等內之旁系血親、二親等內之姻親或家長、家屬，得為受判決人之利益，提起再審之訴。
再審之訴，於原判決執行完畢後，亦得提起之。
但當事人已依上訴主張其事由或知其事由而不為主張者，不在此限：
一、適用法規顯有錯誤。
二、判決職務法庭之組織不合法。
三、依法律或裁定應迴避之法官、參審員參與審判。
四、參與裁判之法官或參審員關於該訴訟違背職務，犯刑事上之罪已經證明，或關於該訴訟違背職務受懲戒處分，足以影響原判決。
五、原判決所憑之證言、鑑定、通譯或證物，已證明係虛偽或偽造、變造。
六、原判決就足以影響於判決之重要證物漏未斟酌。
七、發現確實之新證據，足認應變更原判決。
八、同一行為其後經不起訴處分確定，或為判決基礎之民事或刑事判決及其他裁判或行政處分，依其後之確定裁判或行政處分已變更。
九、確定終局判決所適用之法律或命令，經司法院大法官依當事人之聲請，解釋為牴觸憲法。
前項第四款及第五款情形之證明，以經判決確定，或其刑事訴訟不能開始或續行非因證據不足者為限，得提起再審之訴。
判決確定後受判決人已死亡者，其配偶、直系血親、三親等內之旁系血親、二親等內之姻親或家長、家屬，得為受判決人之利益，提起再審之訴。
再審之訴，於原判決執行完畢後，亦得提起之。