Judges Act Article 49
Judges who are in any of the circumstances stipulated in various subparagraphs of Paragraph 2 of Article 30 shall be subject to disciplinary action when such action is deemed necessary.The provisions in Paragraph 2 of Article 30 concerning the individual case evaluation of judges and provisions in Article 50 concerning the discipline shall also apply to judges transferred to serve as judicial administrative personnel, of retirement, or of resignation for other reasons on their conduct before the transfer, retirement or resignation.No legal opinion on the application of law shall be taken into consideration as the basis of the cause for the disciplinary action against judges.The conduct of the judge that is subject to disciplinary action shall not be disciplined twice for the same conduct. The original disciplinary disposition shall become invalid once the Disciplinary Chamber of the Judiciary has rendered the adjudication with disciplinary action, without disciplinary action or dismissal of the case which has become final and binding for the same conduct.The act of the judge that is subject to disciplinary action has already been punished with criminal or administrative penalties may also be subject to disciplinary action for the same act. The same provision shall apply to the same act of the judge that is not punished with criminal or administrative penalties. However, the disciplinary action shall not be necessary for circumstances of minor violations, which would appear evidently unfair if put under the disciplinary action.Disciplinary actions under any of the following circumstances shall be ruled to be dismissed:1. The same conduct has already been subject to the final disciplinary judgment.2. No discipline is deemed to be necessary once a declaration to deprive citizens' rights is finalized.3. The statute of limitations in accordance with Article 52 on the enforcement of disciplinary action has elapsed. 4. Being in circumstances referred to in the proviso of the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 法官法第49條
法官有第三十條第二項各款所列情事之一,有懲戒之必要者,應受懲戒。
第三十條第二項法官應付個案評鑑之規定及第五十條懲戒之規定,對轉任司法行政人員、退休或其他原因離職之法官,於轉任、退休或離職前之行為亦適用之。
適用法律之見解,不得據為法官懲戒之事由。
法官應受懲戒之同一行為,不受二次懲戒。
同一行為已經職務法庭為懲戒、不受懲戒或免議之判決確定者,其原懲處失其效力。
法官應受懲戒之同一行為已受刑罰或行政罰之處罰者,仍得予以懲戒。
其同一行為不受刑罰或行政罰之處罰者,亦同。
但情節輕微,如予懲戒顯失公平者,無須再予懲戒。
懲戒案件有下列情形之一者,應為免議之判決:
一、同一行為,已受懲戒判決確定。
二、受褫奪公權之宣告確定,認已無受懲戒之必要。
三、已逾第五十二條規定之懲戒權行使期間。
四、有前項但書之情形。
第三十條第二項法官應付個案評鑑之規定及第五十條懲戒之規定,對轉任司法行政人員、退休或其他原因離職之法官,於轉任、退休或離職前之行為亦適用之。
適用法律之見解,不得據為法官懲戒之事由。
法官應受懲戒之同一行為,不受二次懲戒。
同一行為已經職務法庭為懲戒、不受懲戒或免議之判決確定者,其原懲處失其效力。
法官應受懲戒之同一行為已受刑罰或行政罰之處罰者,仍得予以懲戒。
其同一行為不受刑罰或行政罰之處罰者,亦同。
但情節輕微,如予懲戒顯失公平者,無須再予懲戒。
懲戒案件有下列情形之一者,應為免議之判決:
一、同一行為,已受懲戒判決確定。
二、受褫奪公權之宣告確定,認已無受懲戒之必要。
三、已逾第五十二條規定之懲戒權行使期間。
四、有前項但書之情形。