Judges Act Article 30

The Judicial Yuan shall establish the Judicial Evaluation Committee to conduct the evaluation of judges.An individual case evaluation shall be conducted on the judge who has any of the following circumstances:1. For cases with final adjudications or cases that have been pending without final adjudications for more than six years since the date of the filing of action of the first instance, there are sufficient facts to conclude the existence of obvious errors, committed intentionally or with gross negligence, which causes a serious infringement on the rights and interests of the people.2. Severe violations of Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 1 of Article 21.3. Violations of Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 15.4. Severe violations of Paragraph 1 of Article 15, Article 16, or Article 18.5. Severe violations of rules for case management procedures or rules for duties.6. Undue delay of the case process without proper justification which severely affects the rights and interests of the parties.7. Severe violations of ethical rules for judges.Legal opinions on the application of law shall not be taken into consideration as the basis of individual case evaluation of judges.
中文原文 法官法第30條
司法院設法官評鑑委員會,掌理法官之評鑑。
法官有下列各款情事之一者,應付個案評鑑:
一、裁判確定後或自第一審繫屬日起已逾六年未能裁判確定之案件,有事實足認因故意或重大過失,致審判案件有明顯違誤,而嚴重侵害人民權益。
二、有第二十一條第一項第二款情事,情節重大。
三、違反第十五條第二項、第三項規定。
四、違反第十五條第一項、第十六條或第十八條規定,情節重大。
五、違反辦案程序規定或職務規定,情節重大。
六、無正當理由遲延案件之進行,致影響當事人權益,情節重大。
七、違反法官倫理規範,情節重大。
適用法律之見解,不得據為法官個案評鑑之事由。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.