Family Act Article 67
This English translation was last updated on 2012-01-11, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-06-21. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
Where a dispute exists with regard to the existence or non-existence in law of a parent-child relation or an adoptive relation and there is an immediate legal interest in acquiring a determination judgment, an action on the determination of the existence or non-existence of a parent-child relation or an adoptive relation may be initiated.Where, with regard to an action on the determination of the non-existence of a parent-child relation, the court has obtained conviction on the facts of being the natural father on the part of the plaintiff or the defendant, which will lead to a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, the court shall clarify the facts so that the parties may motion to change the claim into one on the determination of the existence of a parent-child relation.Prior to entering a judgment on a motion in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the court shall give the parties and the interested parties an opportunity to make a pleading through an oral argument or a statement with regard to facts relevant to the existence of a parent-child relation.Where an action of Paragraph 1 of this Article was initiated by more than two persons or against more than two persons in accordance with Article 39 of this Act, the court shall handle these matters jointly and enter a joint decision.
中文原文 家事事件法第67條
就法律所定親子或收養關係有爭執,而有即受確認判決之法律上利益者,得提起確認親子或收養關係存在或不存在之訴。
確認親子關係不存在之訴,如法院就原告或被告為生父之事實存在已得心證,而認為得駁回原告之訴者,應闡明當事人得為確認親子關係存在之請求。
法院就前項請求為判決前,應通知有法律上利害關係之第三人,並使當事人或該第三人就親子關係存在之事實,有辯論或陳述意見之機會。
依第三十九條規定,由二人以上或對二人以上提起第一項之訴者,法院應合併審理、合併裁判。
確認親子關係不存在之訴,如法院就原告或被告為生父之事實存在已得心證,而認為得駁回原告之訴者,應闡明當事人得為確認親子關係存在之請求。
法院就前項請求為判決前,應通知有法律上利害關係之第三人,並使當事人或該第三人就親子關係存在之事實,有辯論或陳述意見之機會。
依第三十九條規定,由二人以上或對二人以上提起第一項之訴者,法院應合併審理、合併裁判。