Family Act Article 10
In handling a family matter, when necessary, the court may take evidence on its own initiative, taking into consideration facts not presented by the parties. Nonetheless, the above does not prejudice the circumstances otherwise provided in the statutory law.With regard to matters involving divorce, termination of an adoptive relation, partition of inheritance, or other matters subject to the parties’ own measures, Part II, Chapter I, Section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding agreement on simplifying the issues and Section 3 regarding rules of facts and evidences shall apply, mutatis mutandis, without prejudice to any of the following situations, to which the preceding paragraph shall apply:1. matters involving domestic violence or posing a threat to the interest of a minor child;2. matters posing a threat of infringing the personality of the parties concerned or that of the interested parties;3. where an obvious discrepancy exists between the facts and what the parties acknowledged or agreed to be indisputable facts;4. where, judging from other circumstances, there might results in manifest unfairness.Under the circumstances provided in Paragraph 1 of this Article, the court shall give the parties and the interested parties an opportunity to make a pleading through an oral argument or a statement.
中文原文 家事事件法第10條
法院審理家事事件認有必要時,得斟酌當事人所未提出之事實,並依職權調查證據。
但法律別有規定者,不在此限。
離婚、終止收養關係、分割遺產或其他當事人得處分之事項,準用民事訴訟法第二編第一章第二節有關爭點簡化協議、第三節有關事實證據之規定。
但有下列各款情形之一者,適用前項之規定:
一、涉及家庭暴力或有危害未成年子女利益之虞。
二、有害當事人或關係人人格權之虞。
三、當事人自認及不爭執之事實顯與事實不符。
四、依其他情形顯失公平。
第一項情形,法院應使當事人或關係人有辯論或陳述意見之機會。
但法律別有規定者,不在此限。
離婚、終止收養關係、分割遺產或其他當事人得處分之事項,準用民事訴訟法第二編第一章第二節有關爭點簡化協議、第三節有關事實證據之規定。
但有下列各款情形之一者,適用前項之規定:
一、涉及家庭暴力或有危害未成年子女利益之虞。
二、有害當事人或關係人人格權之虞。
三、當事人自認及不爭執之事實顯與事實不符。
四、依其他情形顯失公平。
第一項情形,法院應使當事人或關係人有辯論或陳述意見之機會。