Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 65

An applicant seeking an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo of a disputed legal relation involving intellectual property must provide a preliminary showing with regard to the existence of such legal relation and the need to maintain the temporary status quo. The court shall dismiss the application if the preliminary showing is insufficient, without allowing the provision of a bond to supplement the above-mentioned insufficiency.The court may still order the applicant having made the above preliminary showing to provide an adequate bond in its ruling on an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo.The court reviewing an application for maintaining the temporary status quo shall, with respect to the necessity of preservation, deliberate the following circumstances:(1) the likelihood of success of the applicant in the future(2) whether the granting or rejection of the application will cause irreparable harm to the applicant or the opposing party(3) the likelihood and extent of current and ongoing harm caused by the injunction to both parties(4) the impact on public interestThe method of injunction maintaining the temporary status quo shall be decided by the court at its discretion, provided that said method must align with the purpose of the injunction maintaining the temporary status quo and may not exceed the necessary extent.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第65條
聲請人就有爭執之智慧財產法律關係聲請定其暫時狀態之處分者,須釋明該法律關係存在及有定暫時狀態之必要;其釋明如有不足,應駁回其聲請,不得以擔保補釋明之不足。
聲請人雖已為前項釋明,法院為定暫時狀態處分之裁定時,仍得命聲請人提供相當之擔保。
法院審理定暫時狀態處分之聲請時,就保全之必要性,應斟酌下列各款情形:
一、聲請人將來勝訴之可能性。
二、聲請之准駁對於聲請人或相對人是否將造成無法彌補之損害。
三、權衡處分與否對兩造現在及繼續損害之可能性及程度。
四、對公眾利益之影響。
定暫時狀態處分之方法,由法院酌量情形定之。
但其方法應符合定暫時狀態處分之目的,且不得逾必要之程度。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.