Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 56
Where a party claims or defends in accordance with Paragraph 1, Article 41 of the Act that an intellectual property right shall be cancelled or revoked, the court shall independently consider the validity of the right and may not rule to stay the legal proceedings on the grounds that administrative review or the administrative proceeding has not concluded.If the right in the preceding paragraph is conclusively found upon administrative review or in an administrative proceeding to be valid, or if by law the right may no longer be asserted in such proceeding, no further claim or defense based on the same facts and evidence may be raised in an intellectual property civil proceeding.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第56條
當事人依本法第四十一條第一項規定,主張或抗辯智慧財產權有應撤銷或廢止原因,法院應自為判斷其權利有效性,不得以行政審查或行政爭訟程序尚未終結為理由,裁定停止訴訟程序。
前項情形,如經行政審查或行政爭訟程序認定該權利為有效確定,或依法已不得於該程序主張者,於智慧財產民事訴訟程序,不得以同一事實及證據再行主張或抗辯。
前項情形,如經行政審查或行政爭訟程序認定該權利為有效確定,或依法已不得於該程序主張者,於智慧財產民事訴訟程序,不得以同一事實及證據再行主張或抗辯。