Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 16
Statements made by a Technical Examination Officer may not be directly admitted as evidence for the purpose of finding on the facts to be established. The parties shall still discharge their burden of proof by presenting evidence with respect to the facts to be established in the action according to the procedures set forth in the applicable laws, without directly adducing the statements of a Technical Examination Officer as evidence.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第16條
技術審查官之陳述，不得直接採為認定待證事實之證據。
當事人就訴訟中待證之事實，仍依各應適用之法律所定程序提出證據，以盡其舉證責任，不得逕行援引技術審查官之陳述而為舉證。
當事人就訴訟中待證之事實，仍依各應適用之法律所定程序提出證據，以盡其舉證責任，不得逕行援引技術審查官之陳述而為舉證。