Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 6
The court may, whenever necessary, order a Technical Examination Officer to perform the following duties:1. ask questions or explain to the parties pertaining to factual and legal issues based on his or her professional knowledge, in order to clarify matters involved in the action2. ask questions directly to witnesses, expert witnesses, or appraisers3. state opinions on the case to the judge4. assist in evidence-taking in the event of preservation of evidence5. assist in injunctive procedures or compulsory enforcement procedures6. assist with a verifier's verificationThe court may order a Technical Examination Officer to compile a report on the results of his or her performance of duties, provided it may order that an interim report and a final report be made where necessary if the case is complicated.A report compiled by a Technical Examination Officer may be disclosed in whole or in part where the court deems necessary.Before any special professional knowledge already known to the court as provided by a Technical Examination Officer is adopted as basis for judgment, the parties shall be accorded an opportunity to present their arguments regarding such knowledge.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第6條
法院於必要時,得命技術審查官執行下列職務:
一、為使訴訟關係明確,就事實上及法律上之事項,基於專業知識對當事人為說明或發問。
二、對證人、專家證人或鑑定人為直接發問。
三、就本案向法官為意見之陳述。
四、於證據保全時協助調查證據。
五、於保全程序或強制執行程序提供協助。
六、於查證人實施查證時提供協助。
法院得命技術審查官就其執行職務之成果,製作報告書。
但案件繁雜而有必要時,得命分別作成中間報告書及總結報告書。
技術審查官製作之報告書,法院認有必要時,得公開全部或一部之內容。
法院因技術審查官提供而獲知之特殊專業知識,應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。
一、為使訴訟關係明確,就事實上及法律上之事項,基於專業知識對當事人為說明或發問。
二、對證人、專家證人或鑑定人為直接發問。
三、就本案向法官為意見之陳述。
四、於證據保全時協助調查證據。
五、於保全程序或強制執行程序提供協助。
六、於查證人實施查證時提供協助。
法院得命技術審查官就其執行職務之成果,製作報告書。
但案件繁雜而有必要時,得命分別作成中間報告書及總結報告書。
技術審查官製作之報告書,法院認有必要時,得公開全部或一部之內容。
法院因技術審查官提供而獲知之特殊專業知識,應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。