Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 20
No person in any of the situations in Article 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a party or a third party may act as a verifier.A verifier shall, within five days of its receipt of the ruling in Paragraph 5 of the preceding article, disclose the following to the court in writing, to be delivered by the court to the parties or third party:1. the academic background, work experience, specialty, or patent infringement actions or non-litigious or court mediation procedures in which it has participated based on its expertise and experience2. whether the verifier has in the last three years shared work or collaborated academically or business-wise with a party, intervener, assistant ad litem, legal representative, agent ad litem, or a third party being verified3. whether the verifier has in the last three years received monetary remuneration or financial sponsorship from a party, intervener, assistant ad litem, legal representative, agent ad litem, or a third party being verified, and the amount or value4. whether the verifier has received other monetary remuneration or financial sponsorship in connection with the case concerned, and the amount or valueRejection of a verifier is governed by Articles 331 to 333 of the Code of Civil Procedure mutatis mutandis.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第20條
與當事人或第三人有民事訴訟法第三十二條各款情形之一者，不得為查證人。
查證人應於收受前條第五項裁定後五日內，以書面揭露下列各款事項提出於法院，並由法院送達於當事人或第三人：
一、學經歷、專業領域或本於其專業學識經驗曾參與專利權侵害訴訟、非訟或法院調解程序之案例。
二、最近三年內是否與當事人、參加人、輔佐人、法定代理人、訴訟代理人或受查證第三人有學術上或業務上之分工或合作關係。
三、最近三年內是否收受當事人、參加人、輔佐人、法定代理人、訴訟代理人或受查證第三人之金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
四、關於該事件，是否有收受其他金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
查證人之拒卻，準用民事訴訟法第三百三十一條至第三百三十三條規定。
查證人應於收受前條第五項裁定後五日內，以書面揭露下列各款事項提出於法院，並由法院送達於當事人或第三人：
一、學經歷、專業領域或本於其專業學識經驗曾參與專利權侵害訴訟、非訟或法院調解程序之案例。
二、最近三年內是否與當事人、參加人、輔佐人、法定代理人、訴訟代理人或受查證第三人有學術上或業務上之分工或合作關係。
三、最近三年內是否收受當事人、參加人、輔佐人、法定代理人、訴訟代理人或受查證第三人之金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
四、關於該事件，是否有收受其他金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
查證人之拒卻，準用民事訴訟法第三百三十一條至第三百三十三條規定。