Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 16
A party to the patent actions in Subparagraphs 2 to 7 of Paragraph 1 of Article 10 may also appoint a patent attorney as the joint agent ad litem with the permission of the presiding judge.The permission in the preceding paragraph may be revoked by the presiding judge by a ruling at any time. A notice of such revocation shall be served on the principal.In the circumstance in Paragraph 1, the patent attorney and the lawyer shall jointly attend court to litigate unless the presiding judge permits otherwise.No act of litigation of a patent attorney that contradicts those of a lawyer is valid.Remuneration of patent attorneys is not part of litigation expenses or procedural costs.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第16條
第十條第一項第二款至第七款之專利權涉訟事件，經審判長許可者，當事人亦得合併委任專利師為訴訟代理人。
前項之許可，審判長得隨時以裁定撤銷之，並應送達於為訴訟委任之人。
第一項情形，專利師應與律師共同到庭為訴訟行為。
但經審判長許可者，不在此限。
專利師之訴訟行為與律師之訴訟行為牴觸者，不生效力。
專利師之酬金，不計入訴訟或程序費用。
前項之許可，審判長得隨時以裁定撤銷之，並應送達於為訴訟委任之人。
第一項情形，專利師應與律師共同到庭為訴訟行為。
但經審判長許可者，不在此限。
專利師之訴訟行為與律師之訴訟行為牴觸者，不生效力。
專利師之酬金，不計入訴訟或程序費用。