Administrative Litigation Act Article 253
In any of the following circumstances, the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court shall be rendered only after oral argument:1. It is necessary to debate and clarify orally complicated legal relationships or conflicting legal opinions;2. It is necessary to elaborate and clarify orally professional knowledge or special experiences;3. It is necessary to conduct oral argument as public interest is implicated or the parties' rights and obligations are significantly affected.The rules governing how oral argument proceeds shall be promulgated by the Supreme Administrative Court.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第253條
最高行政法院之判決，有下列情形之一者，應行言詞辯論：
一、法律關係複雜或法律見解紛歧，有以言詞辯明之必要。
二、涉及專門知識或特殊經驗法則，有以言詞說明之必要。
三、涉及公益或影響當事人權利義務重大，有行言詞辯論之必要。
前項言詞辯論實施之辦法由最高行政法院定之。
一、法律關係複雜或法律見解紛歧，有以言詞辯明之必要。
二、涉及專門知識或特殊經驗法則，有以言詞說明之必要。
三、涉及公益或影響當事人權利義務重大，有行言詞辯論之必要。
前項言詞辯論實施之辦法由最高行政法院定之。