Administrative Litigation Act Article 249
If an appeal against a judgment is not made in conformity with the law, the Supreme Administrative Court shall dismiss the appeal by a ruling. However, if the defect is rectifiable, the presiding judge shall order rectification within a designated period before dismissing the appeal.In cases where the High Administrative Court which rendered the appealed judgment ordered rectification within a period for an appeal not in conformity with the law, and the appellant failed to rectify the defect within the period, the procedure provided in the proviso of the preceding Paragraph may be skipped.If the Supreme Administrative Court considers that an appellant makes an appeal out of malicious, improper, or other purpose to abuse the litigation procedure, or with gross negligence, and the factual or legal assertions lack reasonable basis, it shall dismiss the appeal by a ruling. However, if the defect is rectifiable, the presiding judge shall order rectification within a designated period before dismissing the appeal.If the Supreme Administrative Court dismisses an appeal pursuant to the preceding Paragraph, it may impose a fine up to 120,000 New Taiwan Dollars on the appellants, its representatives or administrators, and agents.Paragraph 5 and the first half of Paragraph 7 of Article 107 apply mutatis mutandis to the situations referred to in the preceding two paragraphs.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第249條
上訴不合法者,最高行政法院應以裁定駁回之。
但其情形可以補正者,審判長應先定期間命補正。
上訴不合法之情形,已經原高等行政法院命補正而未補正者,得不行前項但書之程序。
最高行政法院認上訴人之上訴基於惡意、不當或其他濫用訴訟程序之目的或有重大過失,且事實上或法律上之主張欠缺合理依據,應以裁定駁回之。
但其情形可以補正者,審判長應先定期間命補正。
最高行政法院依前項規定駁回上訴者,得各處上訴人、代表人或管理人、代理人新臺幣十二萬元以下之罰鍰。
第一百零七條第五項及第七項前段規定,於前二項情形準用之。
但其情形可以補正者,審判長應先定期間命補正。
上訴不合法之情形,已經原高等行政法院命補正而未補正者,得不行前項但書之程序。
最高行政法院認上訴人之上訴基於惡意、不當或其他濫用訴訟程序之目的或有重大過失,且事實上或法律上之主張欠缺合理依據,應以裁定駁回之。
但其情形可以補正者,審判長應先定期間命補正。
最高行政法院依前項規定駁回上訴者,得各處上訴人、代表人或管理人、代理人新臺幣十二萬元以下之罰鍰。
第一百零七條第五項及第七項前段規定,於前二項情形準用之。