Administrative Litigation Act Article 237-28
If the High Administrative Court determines that the Urban Plan sought to be declared invalid is unlawful, the Court shall declare the Urban Plan invalid. If the Court determines that matters in the same Urban Plan that are not sought to be declared invalid but are inseparable from the portion sought to be declared invalid, are unlawful, the Court shall simultaneously declare such matters invalid.In the circumstances prescribed in the preceding Paragraph, if the unlawful grounds occur after the Urban Plan has been announced, the Court shall declare that the Urban Plan is invalid starting from the date of occurrence of such unlawful grounds.If the Urban Plan is unlawful and the only legal consequence is to declare such Urban Plan unlawful pursuant to the applicable laws, the Court shall declare the Urban Plan unlawful.The judgment with binding effect rendered pursuant to the three preceding Paragraphs shall have legal effect upon third parties.In the circumstances prescribed in Paragraph 1 of this Article, if the Court determines that another Urban Plan that is inseparable from the portion sought to be declared invalid is also unlawful, the Court may indicate its determination in the reasons of the judgement.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第237-28條
高等行政法院認原告請求宣告無效之都市計畫違法者,應宣告該都市計畫無效。
同一都市計畫中未經原告請求,而與原告請求宣告無效之部分具不可分關係,經法院審查認定違法者,併宣告無效。
前項情形,都市計畫發布後始發生違法原因者,應宣告自違法原因發生時起失效。
都市計畫違法,而依法僅得為違法之宣告者,應宣告其違法。
前三項確定判決,對第三人亦有效力。
第一項情形,高等行政法院認與原告請求宣告無效之部分具不可分關係之不同都市計畫亦違法者,得於判決理由中一併敘明。
同一都市計畫中未經原告請求,而與原告請求宣告無效之部分具不可分關係,經法院審查認定違法者,併宣告無效。
前項情形,都市計畫發布後始發生違法原因者,應宣告自違法原因發生時起失效。
都市計畫違法,而依法僅得為違法之宣告者,應宣告其違法。
前三項確定判決,對第三人亦有效力。
第一項情形,高等行政法院認與原告請求宣告無效之部分具不可分關係之不同都市計畫亦違法者,得於判決理由中一併敘明。