Administrative Litigation Act Article 237-21
The High Administrative Court, after receiving the complaint, shall serve a duplicate copy of the complaint to the defendant.The defendant shall re-examine the lawfulness of the Urban Plan sought to be declared invalid by the plaintiff within two months after receiving a duplicate copy of the complaint, and shall act in accordance with the followings:1. If the defendant finds that the Urban Plan has been made in violation of applicable procedure but such defective procedure can be corrected, it shall correct the defective procedure and inform the High Administrative Court;2. If the defendant finds that the Urban Plan is unlawful, it shall report to the High Administrative Court regarding the unlawful grounds and adopt necessary measures;3. If the defendant confirms that the Urban Plan is lawful, it shall provide explanation in its answer.The defendant shall provide an answer along with the original Urban Plan, its re-examination file and other necessary documents to the High Administrative Court which has jurisdiction over the litigation. The defendant shall also submit to the court all other materials which are inseparable from the Urban Plan sought to be declared invalid.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第237-21條
高等行政法院收受起訴狀後，應將起訴狀繕本送達被告。
被告收受起訴狀繕本後，應於二個月內重新檢討原告請求宣告無效之都市計畫是否合法，並分別依下列規定辦理：
一、如認其違反作成之程序規定得補正者，應為補正，並陳報高等行政法院。
二、如認其違法者，應將其違法情形陳報高等行政法院，並得為必要之處置。
三、如認其合法者，應於答辯狀說明其理由。
被告應附具答辯狀，並將原都市計畫與重新檢討之卷證及其他必要文件，一併提出於管轄之高等行政法院。
如有與原告請求宣告無效之都市計畫具不可分關係者，亦應一併陳報。
被告收受起訴狀繕本後，應於二個月內重新檢討原告請求宣告無效之都市計畫是否合法，並分別依下列規定辦理：
一、如認其違反作成之程序規定得補正者，應為補正，並陳報高等行政法院。
二、如認其違法者，應將其違法情形陳報高等行政法院，並得為必要之處置。
三、如認其合法者，應於答辯狀說明其理由。
被告應附具答辯狀，並將原都市計畫與重新檢討之卷證及其他必要文件，一併提出於管轄之高等行政法院。
如有與原告請求宣告無效之都市計畫具不可分關係者，亦應一併陳報。