Administrative Litigation Act Article 234
The judgment delivered by the court may state the facts and reasons under the same heading and may indicate only the relevant parts, leaving out the less relevant descriptions.District administrative courts may, when announcing the judgment, order the courtroom reporter to write down the minutes of the oral argument or judgment, the holding of the judgment, and the important facts and reasons, and do not enter a separate document for judgement.The minutes or their summary referred to in the preceding Paragraph should be noted separately, signed by the court reporter, and stamped with the court's seal.The service of the minutes or their summary referred to in Paragraph 2 has the same effect as the service of the judgment.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第234條
判決書內之事實、理由,得不分項記載,並得僅記載其要領。
地方行政法院亦得於宣示判決時,命將判決主文及其事實、理由之要領,記載於言詞辯論筆錄或宣示判決筆錄,不另作判決書。
前項筆錄正本或節本,應分別記明之,由書記官簽名並蓋法院印。
第二項筆錄正本或節本之送達,與判決正本之送達,有同一之效力。
地方行政法院亦得於宣示判決時,命將判決主文及其事實、理由之要領,記載於言詞辯論筆錄或宣示判決筆錄,不另作判決書。
前項筆錄正本或節本,應分別記明之,由書記官簽名並蓋法院印。
第二項筆錄正本或節本之送達,與判決正本之送達,有同一之效力。