Administrative Litigation Act Article 143-1
If a witness cannot participate in a court proceeding, or there are other necessary circumstances, the administrative court may examine the witness where the witness is present.If the witness has to make statements based on documents or materials, or if the administrative court considers the nature of the matter or the situation of the witness to warrant the decision, the administrative court may order the parties to the litigation to make written statements together with witnesses in front of notaries public.Witnesses may also make written testimony outside of administrative court if the parties to the litigation consent to the admissibility of such written testimony.Even though written testimony is made per the preceding two paragraphs, if the administrative court considers that the written testimony of the witness requires explanation or one party to the litigation applies to question witnesses, the administrative court may require the witness to participate in the court proceedings.When witnesses make testimony in written form, the truth of the testimony shall be attested to by the witnesses and notarized by notaries public. If the witnesses are examined following Article 130-1, such witnesses shall attest to the truth of their testimony before or after the examination.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第143-1條
證人不能到場,或有其他必要情形時,得就其所在處所訊問之。
證人須依據文書、資料為陳述,或依事件之性質、證人之狀況,經行政法院認為適當者,得命當事人會同證人於公證人前作成陳述書狀。
經當事人同意者,證人亦得於行政法院外以書狀為陳述。
依前二項為陳述後,如認證人之書狀陳述須加說明,或經當事人之一造聲請對證人為必要之發問者,行政法院仍得通知該證人到場陳述。
證人以書狀為陳述者,仍應具結,並將結文附於書狀,經公證人認證後提出。
其依第一百三十條之一為訊問者,亦應於訊問前或訊問後具結。
證人須依據文書、資料為陳述,或依事件之性質、證人之狀況,經行政法院認為適當者,得命當事人會同證人於公證人前作成陳述書狀。
經當事人同意者,證人亦得於行政法院外以書狀為陳述。
依前二項為陳述後,如認證人之書狀陳述須加說明,或經當事人之一造聲請對證人為必要之發問者,行政法院仍得通知該證人到場陳述。
證人以書狀為陳述者,仍應具結,並將結文附於書狀,經公證人認證後提出。
其依第一百三十條之一為訊問者,亦應於訊問前或訊問後具結。