Administrative Litigation Act Article 121
The administrative court may, prior to the oral argument session, take the following measures if it considers necessary to do so in order to expedite the closing of oral argument session:1. To order the parties, their statutory agents, representatives or administrators to appear in person;2. To order the parties to produce drawings/illustrations, schedules/lists, translations of documents written in a foreign language, or other documents and objects;3. To conduct inspections, or order expert testimony, or request an agency or organization to conduct an investigation;4. To notify witnesses or expert witnesses, and to order documents or objects, or order a third party to produce documents or objects; or5. To require a commissioned judge or an assigned judge to take evidence.In order to elucidate or ascertain relations involved in the litigation, the administrative court may, during the oral argument session, take the measures as provided in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 inclusive of the preceding Paragraph, and may temporarily retain in the court the documents and objects produced by a party or a third party.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第121條
行政法院因使辯論易於終結，認為必要時，得於言詞辯論前，為下列各款之處置：
一、命當事人、法定代理人、代表人或管理人本人到場。
二、命當事人提出圖案、表冊、外國文文書之譯本或其他文書、物件。
三、行勘驗、鑑定或囑託機關、團體為調查。
四、通知證人或鑑定人，及調取或命第三人提出文書、物件。
五、使受命法官或受託法官調查證據。
行政法院因闡明或確定訴訟關係，於言詞辯論時，得為前項第一款至第三款之處置，並得將當事人或第三人提出之文書、物件暫留置之。
一、命當事人、法定代理人、代表人或管理人本人到場。
二、命當事人提出圖案、表冊、外國文文書之譯本或其他文書、物件。
三、行勘驗、鑑定或囑託機關、團體為調查。
四、通知證人或鑑定人，及調取或命第三人提出文書、物件。
五、使受命法官或受託法官調查證據。
行政法院因闡明或確定訴訟關係，於言詞辯論時，得為前項第一款至第三款之處置，並得將當事人或第三人提出之文書、物件暫留置之。