Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 57

Where the prosecutor or the defense attorney deems the opposing party violated the obligation of disclosure in accordance with provisions of Articles 53 or 55, the said prosecutor or defense attorney may petition for the court to make a ruling to order the disclosure of evidence.In making the ruling pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the court may designate the date, the method or additional conditions for the disclosure. Before making the ruling pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Article, the court shall hear the opinions of the party against whom such a petition is made; where it deems it necessary, the court may order the prosecutor to submit to the court the inventory of the exhibits or order the parties or the defense attorney to submit the evidence to the court, which shall not be subject to any review, note-taking, copying, photocopying, or video-recording by anyone.An interlocutory appeal may be filed against the ruling made pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this Article. The execution of the ruling ordering the disclosure made by a court shall be suspended pending the hearing of the interlocutory appeal.The court that hears the interlocutory appeal shall make its ruling immediately, and shall make its own ruling if it finds the interlocutory appeal meritorious.
中文原文 國民法官法第57條
檢察官、辯護人認他造違反第五十三條、第五十五條規定未開示應開示之證據者,得聲請法院裁定命開示證據。
前項裁定,法院得指定開示之日期、方法或附加條件。
法院為第一項裁定前,應先聽取他造意見;於認有必要時,得命檢察官向法院提出證據清冊,或命當事人、辯護人向法院提出該證據,並不得使任何人檢閱、抄錄、重製或攝影之。
關於第一項裁定,得抗告。
法院裁定命開示證據者,抗告中,停止執行。
抗告法院應即時裁定,認為抗告有理由者,應自為裁定。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.