Criminal Compensation Act Article 2
This English translation was last updated on 2011-07-06, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-12-15. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
(Scope of criminal compensation (2))In cases that are accepted in accordance with the preceding article, the victim may also seek state compensation pursuant to the Act under any of the following circumstances:1. A person who has been in detention, detained for expert examination or accommodated before the ruling of " not to prosecute " is rendered other than the reason that the act is not punishable or the suspicion of an offense having been committed is insufficient, or withdrawal of a prosecution, and if there is sufficient evidence proving that if there is no such cause and thus such an act shall not be punishable or the suspicion of an offense having been committed is insufficient. 2. A person who has been in detention, detained for expert examination or accommodated before the judgment of "exempt from the prosecution" or "case not entertained" is rendered and becomes final, and if there is sufficient evidence proving that if there is no such cause of "exempt from prosecution" or "case not entertained" then a judgment of not guilty will be rendered.3. A person who has been in detention, detained for expert examination or accommodated, the execution of the punishment for an offense or execution of correction which puts restrictions on personal freedom before the judgment of "exempt from prosecution" or "case not entertained" is rendered and becomes final under the proceeding of the retrial or extraordinary appeal, and if there is sufficient evidence proving that if there is no such cause of "exempt from prosecution" judgment or cause of "case not entertained" then the judgment of not guilty will be rendered.4. A person who has been in detention, detained for expert examination or accommodated before the "prosecution being initiated again for the same case" or the ruling of "not to prosecute" due to the judgment having been rendered and having become final, "exempt from prosecution" or the judgment of "case not entertained" being rendered and having become final, and the same case has been rendered the judgment of guilty and becomes final.5. A person who has been in detention, detained for expert examination or accommodated, punished by sentences, the execution of the punishment for an offense or execution of correction which puts restrictions on personal freedom due to the "prosecution being initiated again for the same case" or "having been rendered a judgement which became final"before a judgment of "exempt from prosecution" or judgment of "case not entertained" being rendered and having become final under the proceeding of the retrial or extraordinary appeal, and the same case has been rendered a judgment of guilty and becomes final. 6. A person who has been detained for expert examination or accommodated before the ruling of "not to hear the case" or "no reasons for protective measures" is rendered and becomes final due to death or the cause under Paragraph 1, Article 19 of the Criminal Code, and if there is sufficient evidence proving that if there is no such cause, then there shall be no reason for protective measures.
中文原文 刑事補償法第2條
依前條法律受理之案件,有下列情形之一者,受害人亦得依本法請求國家補償:
一、因行為不罰或犯罪嫌疑不足以外之事由而經不起訴處分或撤回起訴前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為無該事由即應認行為不罰或犯罪嫌疑不足。
二、免訴或不受理判決確定前曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為如無該判決免訴或不受理之事由即應為無罪判決。
三、依再審或非常上訴程序判決免訴或不受理確定前曾受羈押、鑑定留置、收容、刑罰或拘束人身自由保安處分之執行,如有證據足認為無該判決免訴或不受理之事由即應為無罪判決。
四、因同一案件重行起訴或曾經判決確定而經不起訴處分、免訴或不受理判決確定前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,且該同一案件業經判決有罪確定。
五、因同一案件重行起訴或曾經判決確定,依再審或非常上訴程序判決免訴或不受理確定前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置、收容、刑罰或拘束人身自由保安處分之執行,且該同一案件業經判決有罪確定。
六、因死亡或刑法第十九條第一項規定之事由而經不付審理或不付保護處分之裁定確定前,曾受鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為無該事由即應認無付保護處分之原因。
一、因行為不罰或犯罪嫌疑不足以外之事由而經不起訴處分或撤回起訴前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為無該事由即應認行為不罰或犯罪嫌疑不足。
二、免訴或不受理判決確定前曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為如無該判決免訴或不受理之事由即應為無罪判決。
三、依再審或非常上訴程序判決免訴或不受理確定前曾受羈押、鑑定留置、收容、刑罰或拘束人身自由保安處分之執行,如有證據足認為無該判決免訴或不受理之事由即應為無罪判決。
四、因同一案件重行起訴或曾經判決確定而經不起訴處分、免訴或不受理判決確定前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置或收容,且該同一案件業經判決有罪確定。
五、因同一案件重行起訴或曾經判決確定,依再審或非常上訴程序判決免訴或不受理確定前,曾受羈押、鑑定留置、收容、刑罰或拘束人身自由保安處分之執行,且該同一案件業經判決有罪確定。
六、因死亡或刑法第十九條第一項規定之事由而經不付審理或不付保護處分之裁定確定前,曾受鑑定留置或收容,如有證據足認為無該事由即應認無付保護處分之原因。