Code of Criminal Procedure Article 257
This English translation was last updated on 2020-01-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-05-13. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If the original public prosecutor considers that the application for reconsideration is well-grounded, he shall set aside his ruling and continue the investigation or initiate a prosecution except for the circumstances specified in the preceding section.If the original public prosecutor considers that the application for reconsideration is groundless, he shall immediately send the file and exhibits of the case to the chief public prosecutor of the higher court or the public prosecutor general.An application which is not filed within the time prescribed in the preceding two articles shall be dismissed.If the chief public prosecutor of the original court considers it necessary, he may, before the case is forwarded in accordance with the provisions of section II, personally investigate or order another public prosecutor to investigate or review to determine whether the original ruling should be set aside or upheld; if the original ruling is upheld, the case shall immediately be forwarded.Note: Articles 1 through 343 were amended lastly on February 6, 2003.
中文原文 刑事訴訟法第257條
再議之聲請,原檢察官認為有理由者,應撤銷其處分,除前條情形外,應繼續偵查或起訴。
原檢察官認聲請為無理由者,應即將該案卷宗及證物送交上級檢察署檢察長或檢察總長。
聲請已逾前二條之期間者,應駁回之。
原檢察署檢察長認為必要時,於依第二項之規定送交前,得親自或命令他檢察官再行偵查或審核,分別撤銷或維持原處分;其維持原處分者,應即送交。
原檢察官認聲請為無理由者,應即將該案卷宗及證物送交上級檢察署檢察長或檢察總長。
聲請已逾前二條之期間者,應駁回之。
原檢察署檢察長認為必要時,於依第二項之規定送交前,得親自或命令他檢察官再行偵查或審核,分別撤銷或維持原處分;其維持原處分者,應即送交。