Code of Criminal Procedure Article 219-2
This English translation was last updated on 2020-01-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-05-13. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
The court shall, by a ruling, after consulting with the public prosecutor, overrule the application specified in section III of the preceding article, if the application does not comply with legal formality or it shall not be granted as a matter of law, or it is not supported by good reason, provided that where the deficiency in legal formality is amendable, the court shall order an amendment to be made within a prescribed period.The court shall grant the application for perpetuation of evidence by a ruling, if the court determined that it is supported by good reason.No interlocutory appeals may be taken from the rulings specified in the preceding two sections.Note: Articles 1 through 343 were amended lastly on February 6, 2003.
中文原文 刑事訴訟法第219-2條
法院對於前條第三項之聲請，於裁定前應徵詢檢察官之意見，認為不合法律上之程式或法律上不應准許或無理由者，應以裁定駁回之。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請有理由者，應為准許保全證據之裁定。
前二項裁定，不得抗告。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請有理由者，應為准許保全證據之裁定。
前二項裁定，不得抗告。