Post-Conviction DNA Testing Act Article 7
The court shall overrule the petition initiated pursuant to Article 2, if it does not comply with legal formality, or the court finds it meritless; provided that where the deficiency in legal formality is correctable, the court shall order a correction to be made within a prescribed period.The court shall render a ruling granting the identification upon finding the petition meritorious. If the petitioner disagrees with the court ruling that overruled the petition, he or she may file an interlocutory appeal in writing setting out reasons to the direct appellate court within ten days upon receipt of the ruling.The court of interlocutory appeal shall overrule the petitioner's interlocutory appeal by ruling upon finding an interlocutory appeal illegal or meritless; the court of interlocutory appeal shall revoke the original ruling by ruling upon finding it justified and make its own ruling.No interlocutory re-appeals shall be filed against the ruling of the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 刑事案件確定後去氧核醣核酸鑑定條例第7條
法院對於第二條之聲請，認為不合法律上之程式或無理由者，應以裁定駁回之。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請有理由者，應為准許鑑定之裁定。
聲請人不服駁回聲請之裁定者，得於裁定送達後十日內，以書狀敘明理由，抗告於直接上級法院。
抗告法院認為抗告不合法或無理由者，應以裁定駁回之；認為抗告有理由者，應以裁定將原裁定撤銷，並自為准駁之裁定。
前項裁定，不得再抗告。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者，應定期間先命補正。
法院認為聲請有理由者，應為准許鑑定之裁定。
聲請人不服駁回聲請之裁定者，得於裁定送達後十日內，以書狀敘明理由，抗告於直接上級法院。
抗告法院認為抗告不合法或無理由者，應以裁定駁回之；認為抗告有理由者，應以裁定將原裁定撤銷，並自為准駁之裁定。
前項裁定，不得再抗告。