The Labor Incident Adjudication Rules Article 60

This English translation was last updated on 2019-11-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-23. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.

In a case that involves intellectual property rights, as described in the provisions of Article 4, Paragraph 1, if the circumstances as stipulated in Article 10, Paragraph 4 of the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act exist, the court shall not disclose the said documents and/or objects for inspection. However, this rule does not apply, if it is necessary to disclose such items to the related parties in order to hear their opinions.Under the circumstances described in the proviso of the preceding paragraph, the court must notify the holders of the documents and/or objects for inspection before making disclosure. If the holder files a motion requesting a Confidentiality Preservation Order within fourteen days from the date of receiving the notice, the court shall not disclose the said items before there is a final ruling on the motion.
中文原文 勞動事件審理細則第60條
第四條事件涉及智慧財產權部分,有智慧財產案件審理法第三十四條第四項情形,法院不得開示該文書、勘驗物或鑑定所需資料。
但為聽取訴訟關係人之意見而有向其開示之必要者,不在此限。
前項但書情形,法院於開示前,應通知文書、勘驗物或資料之持有人,持有人於受通知之日起十四日內聲請對受開示者發秘密保持命令者,於聲請裁定確定前,不得開示。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.