Labor Incident Act Article 46
This English translation was last updated on 2018-12-05, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-12-15. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
When a worker applies for a decision of a civil dispute pursuant to the Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes, he/she may file a motion with the court for a provisional attachment, a provisional injunction, or a temporary status quo injunction, prior to the decision being made. If a worker files a motion for a provisional attachment, a provisional injunction, or a temporary status quo injunction in order to secure a compulsory execution or to avoid exacerbating the damagesbased on the request of the decisionafter the arrival of a written decision, subject to the following conditions, the decision may be used as the declaration of the grounds for the provisional attachment, the provisional injunction, or the temporary status quoinjunction, and the court shall not order the worker to provide security prior to the action as a precondition for a provisional remedy:1. The decision has not been approved by the court; 2. The employer initiated a civil suit with the court based on the same event as that of the decision.Before the decisionis finalized, the provisions of Paragraph 1, Article 529 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure shallnot apply to the preceding two paragraphs. For decisionsnot being approved by the court, if the worker initiates an action based on the decision within thirty days of receipt of the notification, the provisions of Paragraph 4,Article 50 of the Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes shall not apply.
中文原文 勞動事件法第46條
勞工依勞資爭議處理法就民事爭議事件申請裁決者,於裁決決定前,得向法院聲請假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分。
勞工於裁決決定書送達後,就裁決決定之請求,欲保全強制執行或避免損害之擴大,向法院聲請假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分時,有下列情形之一者,得以裁決決定代替請求及假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分原因之釋明,法院不得再命勞工供擔保後始為保全處分:
一、裁決決定經法院核定前。
二、雇主就裁決決定之同一事件向法院提起民事訴訟。
前二項情形,於裁決事件終結前,不適用民事訴訟法第五百二十九條第一項之規定。
裁決決定未經法院核定,如勞工於受通知後三十日內就裁決決定之請求起訴者,不適用勞資爭議處理法第五十條第四項之規定。
勞工於裁決決定書送達後,就裁決決定之請求,欲保全強制執行或避免損害之擴大,向法院聲請假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分時,有下列情形之一者,得以裁決決定代替請求及假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分原因之釋明,法院不得再命勞工供擔保後始為保全處分:
一、裁決決定經法院核定前。
二、雇主就裁決決定之同一事件向法院提起民事訴訟。
前二項情形,於裁決事件終結前,不適用民事訴訟法第五百二十九條第一項之規定。
裁決決定未經法院核定,如勞工於受通知後三十日內就裁決決定之請求起訴者,不適用勞資爭議處理法第五十條第四項之規定。