Commercial Case Adjudication Act Article 4
If the Commercial Court deems that a case does not fall under the provisions of Article 2, the court shall rule ex officio, or on a petition, to transfer the case to a district court with jurisdiction. The transferee court shall be bound by the ruling.The reasons for the ruling may comprise the gist of such reasons only.Prior to delivering the ruling on cases, as described in Paragraph 1, by the Commercial Court, parties, or related parties, should be given the opportunity to state their cases before the court. However, if the court deems this inappropriate, this rule does not apply.The ruling, as described in Paragraph 1, is not appealable.After the transferee court delivers a ruling on a case as described in Paragraph 1, the higher court shall not reverse such a ruling based on the grounds of violation of exclusive jurisdiction.
中文原文 商業事件審理法第4條
商業法院認事件不合第二條所定商業事件者，應依職權或依聲請裁定移送於其管轄地方法院；受移送之法院受其羈束。
前項裁定之理由，得僅記載其要領。
商業法院為第一項裁定前，應使當事人或關係人有陳述意見之機會。
但法院認為不適當者，不在此限。
對於第一項裁定，不得聲明不服。
第一項事件，受移送之法院為裁判後，上級法院不得以其違背專屬管轄為由廢棄原裁判。
前項裁定之理由，得僅記載其要領。
商業法院為第一項裁定前，應使當事人或關係人有陳述意見之機會。
但法院認為不適當者，不在此限。
對於第一項裁定，不得聲明不服。
第一項事件，受移送之法院為裁判後，上級法院不得以其違背專屬管轄為由廢棄原裁判。