Code of Civil Procedure Article 447
No additional means of attack or defense shall be presented, except in case of any of the following:1. Where such additional means of attack or defense were prevented from being presented as a result of the court of first instance acting in contravention of the laws and regulations;2. Where the occurrences giving rise to such additional means of attack or defense took place after the conclusion of oral argument in the court of first instance;3. Where additional means of attack or defense are presented for purposes of supplementing those already presented in the first instance;4. Where the occurrences giving rise to such additional means of attack or defense are generally known or known to the court in the course of performing its functions, or the court should take evidence on its own initiative with regard to such occurrences;5. Where the party was unable to present such additional means of attack or defense due to reasons not imputable to him/her;6. Where it would be manifestly unfair to prevent the party from presenting such additional means of attack or defense.The party shall make a preliminary showing of the existence of one or more of the circumstance provided in the proviso of the preceding paragraph.The court of second instance shall reject any additional means of attack or defense presented in violation of the provision of the two preceding paragraphs.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第447條
當事人不得提出新攻擊或防禦方法。
但有下列情形之一者，不在此限：
一、因第一審法院違背法令致未能提出者。
二、事實發生於第一審法院言詞辯論終結後者。
三、對於在第一審已提出之攻擊或防禦方法為補充者。
四、事實於法院已顯著或為其職務上所已知或應依職權調查證據者。
五、其他非可歸責於當事人之事由，致未能於第一審提出者。
六、如不許其提出顯失公平者。
前項但書各款事由，當事人應釋明之。
違反前二項之規定者，第二審法院應駁回之。
但有下列情形之一者，不在此限：
一、因第一審法院違背法令致未能提出者。
二、事實發生於第一審法院言詞辯論終結後者。
三、對於在第一審已提出之攻擊或防禦方法為補充者。
四、事實於法院已顯著或為其職務上所已知或應依職權調查證據者。
五、其他非可歸責於當事人之事由，致未能於第一審提出者。
六、如不許其提出顯失公平者。
前項但書各款事由，當事人應釋明之。
違反前二項之規定者，第二審法院應駁回之。