Code of Civil Procedure Article 384-1
The gist of the facts and the reasons for an interlocutory judgment and those of a judgment entered based on a party's abandonment or admission of the claim may be indicated jointly.Without producing a separate written judgment, the court, upon announcing a judgment, may order that the oral-argument transcript indicate the matter decided and the gist of the reasons for the judgment entered based on a party's abandonment or admission of the claim. The service of an authenticated or extracted copy of such transcript will have the same effect as the service of an authenticated copy of the written judgment.The provision of Article 230 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the transcript provided in the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第384-1條
中間判決或捨棄、認諾判決之判決書,其事實及理由得合併記載其要領。
法院亦得於宣示捨棄或認諾判決時,命將判決主文所裁判之事項及理由要領,記載於言詞辯論筆錄,不另作判決書。
其筆錄正本或節本之送達,與判決正本之送達,有同一之效力。
第二百三十條之規定,於前項筆錄準用之。
法院亦得於宣示捨棄或認諾判決時,命將判決主文所裁判之事項及理由要領,記載於言詞辯論筆錄,不另作判決書。
其筆錄正本或節本之送達,與判決正本之送達,有同一之效力。
第二百三十條之規定,於前項筆錄準用之。