Code of Civil Procedure Article 367-1

The court may examine the parties on its own initiative when it considers it necessary.In the case provided in the preceding paragraph, the presiding judge may, either before or after the examination, order the examined party to sign a written oath, and in such case the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 312, Article 313, and the first paragraph of Article 314 shall apply mutatis mutandis.Where a party refuses to state or sign a written oath without giving a justifiable reason, the court may take such refusal into consideration in finding the truth of the disputed fact.Where a party has been ordered by the court to appear in person and he/she fails to appear without giving a justifiable reason, he/she shall be deemed to have refused to testify, except in cases where the summons is served by deposit or constructive notice.The summons ordering a party to appear in person shall indicate the consequences of a failure to appear as provided in the preceding paragraph and a refusal to state or sign a written oath as provided in the third paragraph.The provisions of the five preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to the statutory agents of the parties.
中文原文 民事訴訟法第367-1條
法院認為必要時,得依職權訊問當事人。
前項情形,審判長得於訊問前或訊問後命當事人具結,並準用第三百十二條第二項、第三百十三條及第三百十四條第一項之規定。
當事人無正當理由拒絕陳述或具結者,法院得審酌情形,判斷應證事實之真偽。
當事人經法院命其本人到場,無正當理由而不到場者,視為拒絕陳述。
但命其到場之通知書係寄存送達或公示送達者,不在此限。
法院命當事人本人到場之通知書,應記載前項不到場及第三項拒絕陳述或具結之效果。
前五項規定,於當事人之法定代理人準用之。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.