Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 91
(Transitional Rules on Proceedings of Pre-Commencement Pending Constitutional Complaints)The provisions of the vacating of a final court decision being declared unconstitutional and its remand to a competent court under Article 62, Paragraph 1, First Sentence shall not apply to the pending petitions in respect of the constitutionality of laws which were lodged with the Constitutional Court prior to the coming into force of this Act.For a petition under the preceding Paragraph, where the legal provisions applied to the underlying final court decision are declared unconstitutional and voided by a judgment of the Constitutional Court, the petitioner may seek judicial remedies for the underlying case through proceedings as provided for by the law or in accordance with the ratio decidendi of the relevant judgment of the Constitutional Court. If the underlying final court decision is on a criminal case, the Attorney General shall, on her or his own motion, file an extraordinary appeal in respect of such decisions.For a petition under Paragraph 1, the period from the date on which it was lodged with the Constitutional Court to the date on which the judgment of the petition is served on the petitioner will not count towards the calculation of the peremptory period of time for the retrial proceedings.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第91條
本法修正施行前已繫屬而尚未終結之人民聲請法規範憲法審查案件,不適用第六十二條第一項前段關於宣告確定終局裁判違憲並廢棄發回管轄法院之規定。
前項聲請案件,判決宣告法規範違憲且應失效者,就已確定之原因案件,聲請人得依法定程序或判決意旨請求救濟;原因案件為刑事確定裁判者,檢察總長亦得據以提起非常上訴。
第一項聲請案件,自聲請案件繫屬之日起至判決送達聲請人之日止,不計入法律規定原因案件再審之最長期間。
前項聲請案件,判決宣告法規範違憲且應失效者,就已確定之原因案件,聲請人得依法定程序或判決意旨請求救濟;原因案件為刑事確定裁判者,檢察總長亦得據以提起非常上訴。
第一項聲請案件,自聲請案件繫屬之日起至判決送達聲請人之日止,不計入法律規定原因案件再審之最長期間。