Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 84
(Petitions Concerning Uniform Interpretation)After exhaustion of all ordinary judicial remedies, any person who believes that, in respect of the same legal provision in a statute or a regulation, a conflict exists between the interpretation rendered by a final court decision that finds against her or him and a prior one rendered by another court of last resort in a different adjudication system may lodge a petition with the Constitutional Court for a judgment of uniform interpretation on the relevant legal provision.The person may not lodge a petition under the preceding Paragraph if the final court decision that renders the conflicting interpretation in finding against him is still subject to challenge through proceedings as provided for by the law or the relevant prior court decision has been overturned.Petitions under the First Paragraph must be lodged within the peremptory period of three months after the service of the relevant final decision.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第84條
人民就其依法定程序用盡審級救濟之案件,對於受不利確定終局裁判適用法規範所表示之見解,認與不同審判權終審法院之確定終局裁判適用同一法規範已表示之見解有異,得聲請憲法法庭為統一見解之判決。
前項情形,如人民得依法定程序聲明不服,或後裁判已變更前裁判之見解者,不得聲請。
第一項聲請,應於該不利確定終局裁判送達後三個月之不變期間內為之。
前項情形,如人民得依法定程序聲明不服,或後裁判已變更前裁判之見解者,不得聲請。
第一項聲請,應於該不利確定終局裁判送達後三個月之不變期間內為之。