Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 74
(Impeachment Proceedings at Oral Argument Sessions)At oral argument, the petitioning authority shall state the facts of and the reasons for the impeachment, followed by the reply of the impeached.Following the reply of the impeached, the presiding Justice shall examine evidence and hear oral arguments on points of fact and law from the listed below in order: (1) the petitioning authority;(2) the impeached; and(3) the defense counsel.Points of fact and law having been debated may be subject to further debate; the presiding Justice may also require points of fact and law having been debated to be further debated.Before the conclusion of the argument, the presiding Justice shall provide the impeached with an opportunity to state opinions.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第74條
言詞辯論期日，聲請機關及被彈劾人應依序陳述彈劾意旨及就彈劾事實為答辯。
被彈劾人答辯後，審判長應調查證據，並應命依下列次序，就事實及法律辯論之：
一、聲請機關。
二、被彈劾人。
三、辯護人。
已辯論者，得再為辯論；審判長亦得命再行辯論。
審判長於宣示辯論終結前，最後應訊問被彈劾人有無陳述。
被彈劾人答辯後，審判長應調查證據，並應命依下列次序，就事實及法律辯論之：
一、聲請機關。
二、被彈劾人。
三、辯護人。
已辯論者，得再為辯論；審判長亦得命再行辯論。
審判長於宣示辯論終結前，最後應訊問被彈劾人有無陳述。