Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 43

(Preliminary Injunction)As is required to prevent the basic rights protected under the Constitution and public interest from being irreparably and materially impaired, a preliminary injunction order, as the last resort, may be rendered by the Constitutional Court, on its own motion or the party's, in respect of the underlying disputes, the application of the impugned legal provision, or the enforcement of the impugned court decision that underlies the petition, inter alia, while the petition is pending before the Constitutional Court.Prior to rendering the order referred to in the preceding Paragraph, the Constitutional Court may give the parties or the interested persons the opportunity to state opinions or conduct the necessary investigations on its own.A preliminary injunction order shall be rendered by a majority of the total number of the incumbent Justices of the Constitutional Court with a quorum of two-thirds of the total number of the incumbent Justices thereof taking part in the proceedings and shall give reasons.A preliminary injunction will cease to have effect, where(1) the final decision of the case has been rendered; (2) over six months have elapsed since its issue; or (3) the Constitutional Court has revoked the preliminary injunction order due to changes in circumstances or other special reasons in accordance with the procedural provision of the preceding Paragraph.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第43條
聲請案件繫屬中,憲法法庭為避免憲法所保障之權利或公益遭受難以回復之重大損害,且有急迫必要性,而無其他手段可資防免時,得依聲請或依職權,就案件相關之爭議、法規範之適用或原因案件裁判之執行等事項,為暫時處分之裁定。
憲法法庭為前項裁定前,得命當事人或關係人陳述意見或為必要之調查。
暫時處分之裁定,應經大法官現有總額三分之二以上參與評議,大法官現有總額過半數同意,並應附具理由。
暫時處分有下列情形之一者,失其效力:
一、聲請案件業經裁判。
二、裁定後已逾六個月。
三、因情事變更或其他特殊原因,經憲法法庭依前項之評決程序裁定撤銷。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.