Constitutional Court Procedure Act Article 20

(Amici Curiae) Any person, authority, or association, other than the parties, who considers herself or himself having an interest in a case pending before the Constitutional Court, may make a motion to the Court, subject to its permission by an order, for the submission of expert opinion or information to be considered within the period of time prescribed by the Constitutional Court.The motion under the preceding Paragraph must set out the interests concerned in writing.Paragraph 3 of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis when a third-party person or association submit expert opinion or information as permitted by a court order.A third-party person, authority, or association who is permitted by a court order to submit expert opinion or information must appoint an agent. The provisions of Article 8 shall govern the qualifications and number of such agents.As is required by the case to summon those permitted third-party persons, authorities, or associations to appear in court, the Constitutional Court shall serve them with the summons.In the case that the expert opinion or information submitted by the person, authority or association under in Paragraph 1 is cited by a party, it shall be regarded as the citing party's own statement.
中文原文 憲法訴訟法第20條
當事人以外之人民、機關或團體,認其與憲法法庭審理之案件有關聯性,得聲請憲法法庭裁定許可,於所定期間內提出具參考價值之專業意見或資料,以供憲法法庭參考。
前項聲請,應以書面敘明關聯性為之。
當事人以外之人民或團體,依裁定許可提出專業意見或資料時,準用前條第三項之規定。
當事人以外之人民、機關或團體依裁定許可提出專業意見或資料時,應委任代理人;其資格及人數依第八條之規定。
憲法法庭審理案件認有必要通知其裁定許可之當事人以外之人民、機關或團體到庭說明、陳述意見時,應以通知書送達。
第一項人民、機關或團體提出專業意見或資料,經當事人引用者,視為該當事人之陳述。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.