The Administrative Court Organization Act Article 15-8
When adjudicating legal disputes, the Grand Chamber should conduct oral arguments.The parties should retain an agent ad litem to perform the oral arguments, as mentioned in the preceding Paragraph. On the date of oral arguments, as referred to in the first Paragraph, if one of the parties has not retained an agent ad litem, or if the agent ad litem is not present, adjudication shall be decided after the agent ad litem who is present makes his/her statement. If agents ad litem of both parties are not present, the oral arguments will not be conducted.When the Grand Chamber deems it necessary, the Court may ex officio, or on a motion by the parties, their agents, or defense attorneys, select experts or scholars of specific professional legal issues to present their legal opinions in writing, or make statements during oral arguments.The persons, who present statements as described in the preceding Paragraph, shall disclose the following information:1. Whether or not, during the preparation or submission of relevant professional opinions or information, they have a delegation or cooperation relationship with the parties, interested parties, or their agents.2. Whether or not, during the preparation or submission of relevant professional opinions or information, they have received monetary remuneration, or financial assistance, or its equivalent price or value, from the parties, interested parties, or their agents.3. The identities of other people who provided monetary remuneration or assistance, and its price or value.
中文原文 行政法院組織法第15-8條
大法庭裁判法律爭議,應行言詞辯論。
前項辯論,當事人應委任訴訟代理人為之。
第一項之辯論期日,當事人一造未委任訴訟代理人或訴訟代理人未到場者,得由到場之訴訟代理人陳述後為裁定。
當事人之訴訟代理人均未到場者,得不行辯論。
大法庭認有必要時,得依職權或依當事人或其訴訟代理人之聲請,就專業法律問題選任專家學者,以書面或於言詞辯論時到場陳述其法律上意見。
前項陳述意見之人,應揭露下列資訊:
一、相關專業意見或資料之準備或提出,是否與當事人、關係人或其代理人有分工或合作關係。
二、相關專業意見或資料之準備或提出,是否受當事人、關係人或其代理人之金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
三、其他提供金錢報酬或資助者之身分及其金額或價值。
前項辯論,當事人應委任訴訟代理人為之。
第一項之辯論期日,當事人一造未委任訴訟代理人或訴訟代理人未到場者,得由到場之訴訟代理人陳述後為裁定。
當事人之訴訟代理人均未到場者,得不行辯論。
大法庭認有必要時,得依職權或依當事人或其訴訟代理人之聲請,就專業法律問題選任專家學者,以書面或於言詞辯論時到場陳述其法律上意見。
前項陳述意見之人,應揭露下列資訊:
一、相關專業意見或資料之準備或提出,是否與當事人、關係人或其代理人有分工或合作關係。
二、相關專業意見或資料之準備或提出,是否受當事人、關係人或其代理人之金錢報酬或資助及其金額或價值。
三、其他提供金錢報酬或資助者之身分及其金額或價值。