The Administrative Court Organization Act Article 15-4

During a trial in a panel of the Supreme Administrative Court, if there are legal opinions in which the parties consider significant enough to sway the judgment, are dissenting with the antecedent judgment opinions, or are significant in general principle, the parties may indicate the following information in a written statement, and file a motion with the court that accepted the case to submit said case with a ruling to the Grand Chamber for judgment.1. Legal provisions involved;2. The judgment that derives from dissenting opinions, or the specific contents of the legal opinion that are significant in general principle;3. The impact of the said dissenting opinions, or the opinions of general significance, on the outcome of the judgment;4. The legal opinions and reasons held by the movant.The parties should retain an agent ad litem to file a motion, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph.Any one of the panels of the Supreme Administrative Court may rule to reject the motion if it deems that the motion is not in compliance with legal procedures, or if it should not be legally permitted.