The Administrative Court Organization Act Article 15-2
When any of the supreme administrative courts reviews a trial case, if the judgment-based legal opinion is deemed, after a review, different from the antecedent legal opinion for the judgment, reasons should be stated in a ruling, and the case should be submitted to the Grand Chamber for adjudication.Before making a ruling for a case as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the said supreme administrative court should confer with the opinions of other courts with letters of consultation. The consulting court shall reply in writing within 30 days; if no reply is received within 30 days, it is deemed to maintain the antecedent legal opinion for the judgment. Only after one of the consulting courts asserts a stand to maintain the antecedent legal opinion, can the court then make a ruling for the case, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
中文原文 行政法院組織法第15-2條
最高行政法院各庭審理事件，經評議後認採為裁判基礎之法律見解，與先前裁判之法律見解歧異者，應以裁定敘明理由，提案予大法庭裁判。
最高行政法院各庭為前項裁定前，應先以徵詢書徵詢其他庭之意見。
受徵詢庭應於三十日內以回復書回復之，逾期未回復，視為主張維持先前裁判之法律見解。
經任一受徵詢庭主張維持先前裁判之法律見解時，始得為前項裁定。
最高行政法院各庭為前項裁定前，應先以徵詢書徵詢其他庭之意見。
受徵詢庭應於三十日內以回復書回復之，逾期未回復，視為主張維持先前裁判之法律見解。
經任一受徵詢庭主張維持先前裁判之法律見解時，始得為前項裁定。