Compliance Approval Regulations on Controlled Telecommunications Radio-Frequency Devices Article 22

The original certification body may revoke the approval certificate if the certificate holder submits a fraudulent or false device or data.The original certification body may rescind the approval certificate of the certificate holder in any of the following circumstances:1. Failure to re-apply for compliance approval for changes to the device.2. Failure to re-apply for approval after the amendments to technical specifications.3. Failure to register the brand name, model number and appearance photos of final product, and no correction was made within a prescribed period.4. Failure to affix approval or DoC label as regulated, and no corrective action was undertaken within a prescribed period.5. Failure to affix or emboss Chinese warning message in designated location, and no correction was made within a prescribed period.6. Regarding the use of original approval label, no sufficient and correct information was provided in the user manual or on the package, and no corrective action was undertaken within a prescribed period.7. The sample device does not comply with the original sample or Article 4.8. Forbidden to sell approved CTRFD due to agency or patent lawsuit or violation of other regulations.9. Failure to remit payment to the certification body for device-purchase expense; or failure to provide or assist to provide the certification body with the device, specific test software, specific fixture, examination report, test report or compliance approval related data for inspection.
中文原文 電信管制射頻器材審驗辦法第22條
取得審驗證明者,經發現其申請時所檢附之器材或資料偽造或虛偽不實時,原驗證機關(構)得撤銷其審驗證明。
取得審驗證明者,有下列情形之一時,原驗證機關(構)得廢止其審驗證明:
一、變更器材未依規定重新申請審驗。
二、技術規範修正後,未依規定重新審驗。
三、未登錄最終產品廠牌、型號及外觀照片,經限期改正仍未改正。
四、未依規定黏貼審驗合格標籤或符合性聲明標籤,經限期改正仍未改正。
五、未依規定於指定位置黏貼或印鑄中文警語,經限期改正仍未改正。
六、使用原審驗合格標籤未於說明書及包裝盒提供充分與正確之資訊,經限期改正仍未改正。
七、經抽驗與原樣品不符或不符合第四條規定者。
八、因代理權、專利權爭議或違反其他規定,致不得販賣取得審驗證明之電信管制射頻器材。
九、未依規定支付驗證機關(構)購買器材之費用、拒不協助或提供器材、必要之特殊測試軟體、特殊治具、檢驗報告、測試報告或審驗相關資料供抽驗。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.