The Act Governing Bills Finance Business Article 58-3
Where a gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff member of a Bills Finance Company under Article 58, Paragraph 1, or by a committer of a violation under Article 58-1, Paragraph 1, is prejudicial to the rights of a Bills Finance Company, the Bills Finance Company may apply to the court to cancel such act.Where a non-gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff member of a Bills Finance Company or a committer of a violation as referred to in the preceding paragraph is done with the knowledge, at the time of commission, that it would be prejudicial to the rights of a Bills Finance Company, and the beneficiary of the act also knows such circumstances at the time the benefit is received, the Bills Finance Company may apply to the court to cancel such act.When applying to the court for cancellation under either of the preceding two paragraphs, a party may also apply to the court to order the beneficiary or any party to whom the benefit has been transferred to restore the status quo ante; provided, this shall not apply where the party to whom the benefit has been transferred was not aware at the time of transfer that there was any cause for cancellation.Any disposition of property between a responsible person or staff member of a Bills Finance Company or a committer of a violation as referred to in Paragraph 1, and such person's spouse, lineal relative, cohabiting relative, head of household, or family member shall be deemed a gratuitous act.Any disposition of property between a responsible person or staff member of a Bills Finance Company or a committer of a violation as referred to in Paragraph 1 and any person other than those set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be presumed to be a gratuitous act.The right to cancellation under Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be extinguished one year after the time the Bills Finance Company is aware of any cause for cancellation if the Bills Finance Company fails to exercise the right, or ten years after the time of the act.
中文原文 票券金融管理法第58-3條
第五十八條第一項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或第五十八條之一第一項之行為人所為之無償行為，有害及票券金融公司之權利者，票券金融公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
前項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於票券金融公司之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，票券金融公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自票券金融公司知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。
前項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於票券金融公司之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，票券金融公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之票券金融公司負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自票券金融公司知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。