Trust Enterprise Act Article 48-4
Where a gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff of a trust enterprise specified in Article 48-1, paragraph 1, or by a committer of a violation under Article 48-2, paragraph 1, is prejudicial to the rights of a trust enterprise, the trust enterprise may apply to the court to cancel such act.Where a non-gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff of a trust enterprise or a committer of a violation as referred to in the preceding paragraph is done with the knowledge, at the time of commission, that it would be prejudicial to the rights of a trust enterprise, and the beneficiary of the act also knows such circumstances at the time the benefit is received, the trust enterprise may apply to the court to cancel such act.When applying to the court for cancellation under either of the preceding two paragraphs, a party may also apply to the court to order the beneficiary or any party to whom the benefit has been transferred to restore the status quo ante, provided that this shall not apply where the party to whom the benefit has been transferred was not aware at the time of transfer that there was any cause for cancellation.
中文原文 信託業法第48-4條
第四十八條之一第一項之信託業負責人、職員或第四十八條之二第一項之行為人所為之無償行為，有害及信託業之權利者，信託業得聲請法院撤銷之。
前項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於信託業之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，信託業得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自信託業知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。
前項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於信託業之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，信託業得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之信託業負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自信託業知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。