Financial Holding Company Act Article 57-3
Where a gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff member of a financial holding company under Article 57, Paragraph 1, or by a committer of a violation under Article 57-1, Paragraph 1, is prejudicial to the rights of a financial holding company, the financial holding company may file a motion with a court to revoke the act.Where a non-gratuitous act done by a responsible person or staff member of a financial holding company or a committer of a violation as referred to in the preceding paragraph is done with the knowledge, at the time of commission, that it would be prejudicial to the rights of a financial holding company, and the beneficiary of the act also knows such circumstances at the time the benefit is received, the financial holding company may file a motion with a court to revoke the act.When filing a motion with a court for revocations under either of the preceding two paragraphs, a party may also file a motion with the court to order the beneficiary or any party to whom the benefit has been transferred to restore the status quo ante; provided, this shall not apply where the party to whom the benefit has been transferred was not aware at the time of transfer that there was cause for revocation.Any disposition of property between a responsible person or staff member of a financial holding company or a committer of a violation as referred to in Paragraph 1 and such a person's spouse, lineal relative, cohabiting relative, head of household, or family member shall be deemed to be a gratuitous act.Any disposition of property between a responsible person or staff member of a financial holding company or a committer of a violation as referred to in Paragraph 1 and any person other than those set forth in the preceding paragraph shall be presumed to be a gratuitous act.The claim for revocation under Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be extinguished one year after the time the financial holding company knows there is cause for revocation if the financial holding company fails to exercise the right, or ten years after the time of the act.
中文原文 金融控股公司法第57-3條
第五十七條第一項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或第五十七條之一第一項之行為人所為之無償行為，有害及金融控股公司之權利者，金融控股公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
前項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於金融控股公司之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，金融控股公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自金融控股公司知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。
前項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人所為之有償行為，於行為時明知有損害於金融控股公司之權利，且受益人於受益時亦知其情事者，金融控股公司得聲請法院撤銷之。
依前二項規定聲請法院撤銷時，得並聲請命受益人或轉得人回復原狀。
但轉得人於轉得時不知有撤銷原因者，不在此限。
第一項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人與其配偶、直系親屬、同居親屬、家長或家屬間所為之處分其財產行為，均視為無償行為。
第一項之金融控股公司負責人、職員或行為人與前項以外之人所為之處分其財產行為，推定為無償行為。
第一項及第二項之撤銷權，自金融控股公司知有撤銷原因時起，一年間不行使，或自行為時起經過十年而消滅。