Deposit Insurance Act Article 24

The CDIC may inspect the following items of an insured institution:1. The accuracy of the deposit assessment base and content of the electronic data files stipulated in Paragraph 1 of the preceding Article.2. Any event causing the termination of the deposit insurance agreement.3. Assets and liabilities of insured institutions prior to the fulfillment of insurance responsibilities.4. Property information and information needed to pursue civil liabilities for illegal acts or omissions by employees of failed insured institutions and by those of problem insured institutions that receive financial assistance according to Paragraph 1 of Article 29.When the CDIC undertakes inspection according to Subparagraph 3 or 4 of the aforesaid Paragraph, if an insured institution has made any improper funds transfers or property transaction with its controlling financial holding companies, other subsidiaries thereof, or non-credit departments of farmer's or fishermen's associations with the potential to jeopardize the insurance payout special reserves, the CDIC may report to the competent authority or the central competent authority of the agricultural finance and undertake inspections, after obtaining their approval, of the said financial holding companies, the subsidiaries thereof, and the non-credit departments of farmers' and fishermen's associations.In undertaking the inspection stipulated in Subparagraph 4 of Paragraph 1, the CDIC may obtain or review relevant property and household registration information from government authorities, financial institutions, or securities' central depository agencies.
中文原文 存款保險條例第24條
存保公司得對要保機構辦理下列事項之查核:
一、存款保險費基數正確性及前條第一項所定電子資料檔案建置內容。
二、是否有應終止要保契約情事。
三、履行保險責任前要保機構之資產及負債。
四、停業要保機構及依第二十九條第一項規定提供財務協助之問題要保機構違法失職人員財產資料及民事責任追償。
存保公司依前項第三款或第四款規定查核時,如要保機構與其從屬金融控股公司、該控股公司之其他子公司或農會、漁會非信用部門,有不當資金移轉或財產交易,致有損及保險賠款特別準備金之虞時,存保公司得報經主管機關或農業中央主管機關同意後,對其所從屬金融控股公司、該控股公司之其他子公司或農會、漁會非信用部門查核。
存保公司辦理第一項第四款規定之查核時,得向政府機關(構)、金融機構或有價證券集中保管機構索取或閱覽相關財產及戶籍等資料。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.