Securities Investor and Futures Trader Protection Act Article 26
When mediation is successful, the protection institution shall produce a mediation agreement and, within 7 days from the day the mediation is successfully concluded, submit it, along with the mediation case file and evidence, for ratification by the jurisdictional district court of the place where the protection institution is located.If the court declines to ratify the mediation agreement because the content violates of law or regulation, public order, or good morals or because its compulsory enforcement is not possible for some other reason, the court shall notify the protection institution of the reasons.Unless there is a circumstance mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the court shall ratify the mediation agreement referred to in paragraph 1. After the court has ratified the mediation agreement, it shall return the ratified mediation agreement, together with the mediation case file and evidence, to the protection institution, and the protection institution shall serve the ratified mediation agreement on the parties involved. The service of the mediation documents shall be governed mutatis mutandis by the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.A mediation ratified by a court shall have the same force and effect as a final and binding civil judgment.If a cause exists for finding a mediation ratified by a court invalid or voidable, a party to the dispute may institute an action to declare the mediation invalid or void in the court that originally ratified the mediation. That action may be joined with an action on the original mediation matter, or a counterclaim may be instituted and the court requested to decide the matter jointly when issuing a declaration invalidating or voiding the mediation agreement. Such action or counterclaim will be deemed to have been instituted from the time of the application for mediation.An action to declare a mediation invalid or void shall not prejudice rights obtained in good faith by a third party.The circumstances under paragraph 5 shall be governed mutatis mutandis by Articles 500 to 502 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Article 18, paragraph 2 of the Compulsory Enforcement Act.
中文原文 證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法第26條
調處成立者,保護機構應作成調處書,併同調處事件卷證,於調處成立之日起七日內,送請保護機構所在地之管轄地方法院核定。
法院因調處書內容牴觸法令、違背公共秩序或善良風俗或有其他不能強制執行之原因而未予核定者,法院應將其理由通知保護機構。
除有前項情形外,法院對於第一項之調處書應予核定。
法院核定後,應將經核定之調處書併同調處事件卷證發還保護機構,並由保護機構將經核定之調處書送達當事人。
調處文書之送達,準用民事訴訟法關於送達之規定。
經法院核定之調處,與民事確定判決有同一之效力。
經法院核定之調處有無效或得撤銷之原因者,當事人得向原核定法院提起宣告調處無效或撤銷調處之訴,並得就原調處事件合併起訴或提起反訴,請求法院於宣告調處無效或撤銷調處時,合併裁判之,並視為自申請調處時已經起訴。
調處無效或撤銷調處之訴之判決,於第三人以善意取得之權利無影響。
第五項情形,準用民事訴訟法第五百條至第五百零二條、強制執行法第十八條第二項規定。
法院因調處書內容牴觸法令、違背公共秩序或善良風俗或有其他不能強制執行之原因而未予核定者,法院應將其理由通知保護機構。
除有前項情形外,法院對於第一項之調處書應予核定。
法院核定後,應將經核定之調處書併同調處事件卷證發還保護機構,並由保護機構將經核定之調處書送達當事人。
調處文書之送達,準用民事訴訟法關於送達之規定。
經法院核定之調處,與民事確定判決有同一之效力。
經法院核定之調處有無效或得撤銷之原因者,當事人得向原核定法院提起宣告調處無效或撤銷調處之訴,並得就原調處事件合併起訴或提起反訴,請求法院於宣告調處無效或撤銷調處時,合併裁判之,並視為自申請調處時已經起訴。
調處無效或撤銷調處之訴之判決,於第三人以善意取得之權利無影響。
第五項情形,準用民事訴訟法第五百條至第五百零二條、強制執行法第十八條第二項規定。