Regulations on Preferred Procurement for Products and Services Produced in Disability Welfare Care Facilities and Institutions and Sheltered Workshops Article 9
For preferred procurement cases described in Article 7, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 2, obligated procurement units shall award the tender to the bidder with the most advantageous offer in accordance with the following provisions:1.Tenders with a fixed rate or without a reserve price:1)A tie between preferred and regular providers:a.In the event of a tie between a preferred provider and regular provider whose bids have both been determined by a majority vote of the procurement review committee to be consistent with tender requirements, the procurement unit shall first enter into price negotiations with sheltered workshops, followed by institutions and then organizations.b.In the event of a tie between two or more participating workshops (or in the absence of any bidding workshops, between two or more institutions/organizations), the one with the highest score in the most heavily-weighted scoring item shall be given priority. If two or more scoring items have the same weight, the combined score of all such items shall apply. If a tie still persists, lots shall be drawn.2)A regular provider has the most advantageous offer:a.If a regular provider has the highest score or the best ranking and there is only one participating preferred provider, the obligated procurement unit shall first enter into price negotiations with the preferred provider, provided that the bids of both the regular and preferred providers are determined by a majority vote of the procurement review committee to be consistent with tender requirements.b.In the event that there are multiple preferred providers, the obligated procurement unit shall enter into price negotiations with each provider (beginning from the top-ranked/highest-scoring one). In the event of a tie between two or more preferred providers, the one with the highest score in the most heavily-weighted scoring item shall be given priority. If two or more scoring items have the same weight, the combined score of all such items shall apply. If a tie still persists, lots shall be drawn.2.Tenders without an estimate nor a fixed rate or price: Winners shall be determined through price negotiations, with a price recommended by the procurement review committee in accordance with Article 75 of the Enforcement Rules of the Government Procurement Act. However, if all bids are within the reasonable price range, the committee may abstain from recommending a price and directly award the contract to the winning bidder or rescind the tender in accordance with the following provisions:1)A tie between preferred and regular providers:a.In the event of a tie between a preferred provider and a regular provider whose bids have both been determined by a majority vote of the procurement review committee to be consistent with tender requirements, the procurement unit shall first enter into price negotiations with sheltered workshops, followed by institutions and then organizations.b.In the event of a tie between two or more participating workshops (or in the absence of any bidding workshops, between two or more institutions/organizations), the one with the highest score in the most heavily-weighted scoring item shall be given priority. If two or more scoring items have the same weight, the combined score of all such items shall apply. If a tie still persists, lots shall be drawn.2)A regular provider has the most advantageous offer:a.If a regular provider has the highest score or the best ranking and there is only one participating preferred provider, the obligated procurement unit shall first enter into price negotiations with the preferred provider, provided that the bids of both the regular and preferred providers are determined by a majority vote of the procurement review committee to be consistent with tender requirements.b.In the event that there are multiple preferred providers, the obligated procurement unit shall enter into price negotiations with each provider (beginning from the top-ranked/highest-scoring one). In the event of a tie between two or more preferred providers, the one with the highest score in the most heavily-weighted scoring item shall be given priority. If two or more scoring items have the same weight, the combined score of all such items shall apply. If a tie still persists, lots shall be drawn.3.The provisions in the preceding subparagraph may apply mutatis mutandis to tenders with an estimate. In the event that an eligible provider offers a price higher than the estimate, the provisions of Article 53, Paragraph 2 of the Government Procurement Act shall apply.
中文原文 優先採購身心障礙福利機構團體或庇護工場生產物品及服務辦法第9條
義務採購單位依第七條第二項第二款規定辦理優先採購者，其參考最有利標決標方式如下：
一、不訂底價，且已載明固定費用或費率決標者，依該服務費用或費率決標：
（一）優採廠商與一般廠商總評分或序位合計值相同：1.優採廠商與一般廠商，其總評分或序位合計值相同，且經依法令成立之採購評審小組過半數決定均符合需要者，應優先與庇護工場議價，其次為機構或團體。
2.庇護工場有二家以上者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
無庇護工場參加投標，而有二家以上機構或團體參加投標者，亦同。
（二）一般廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低：1.一般廠商之廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，如優採廠商僅一家，且亦經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，義務採購單位應優先與該優採廠商議價。
2.優採廠商二家以上者，義務採購單位應依總評分名次或序位合計值名次，依序與該優採廠商議價；二家以上總評分名次或序位合計值名次相同者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、不訂底價，且未載明固定費用或費率決標者：採議價方式決標，並應依政府採購法施行細則第七十五條規定辦理，由評審委員會提出建議金額。
但投標價合理者，評審委員會得不提出建議之金額，適用政府採購法第五十四條規定予以決標或廢標，並依下列規定議價：
（一）優採廠商與一般廠商總評分或序位合計值相同：1.優採廠商與一般廠商之廠商，其總評分或序位合計值相同，經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，應優先與庇護工場議價，其次為機構或團體。
2.庇護工場有二家以上者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
無庇護工場參加投標，而有二家以上機構或團體參加投標者，亦同。
（二）一般廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低：1.一般廠商之廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，如優採廠商僅一家，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，義務採購單位應優先與該優採廠商議價。
2.優採廠商有二家以上者，義務採購單位應依總評分名次或序位合計值名次，依序與該優採廠商議價；二家以上總評分名次或序位合計值名次相同者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
三、訂有底價決標者，準用前款規定辦理；合於招標文件規定之投標廠商標價超過底價時，依政府採購法第五十三條第二項規定辦理。
一、不訂底價，且已載明固定費用或費率決標者，依該服務費用或費率決標：
（一）優採廠商與一般廠商總評分或序位合計值相同：1.優採廠商與一般廠商，其總評分或序位合計值相同，且經依法令成立之採購評審小組過半數決定均符合需要者，應優先與庇護工場議價，其次為機構或團體。
2.庇護工場有二家以上者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
無庇護工場參加投標，而有二家以上機構或團體參加投標者，亦同。
（二）一般廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低：1.一般廠商之廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，如優採廠商僅一家，且亦經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，義務採購單位應優先與該優採廠商議價。
2.優採廠商二家以上者，義務採購單位應依總評分名次或序位合計值名次，依序與該優採廠商議價；二家以上總評分名次或序位合計值名次相同者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、不訂底價，且未載明固定費用或費率決標者：採議價方式決標，並應依政府採購法施行細則第七十五條規定辦理，由評審委員會提出建議金額。
但投標價合理者，評審委員會得不提出建議之金額，適用政府採購法第五十四條規定予以決標或廢標，並依下列規定議價：
（一）優採廠商與一般廠商總評分或序位合計值相同：1.優採廠商與一般廠商之廠商，其總評分或序位合計值相同，經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，應優先與庇護工場議價，其次為機構或團體。
2.庇護工場有二家以上者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
無庇護工場參加投標，而有二家以上機構或團體參加投標者，亦同。
（二）一般廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低：1.一般廠商之廠商總評分最高或序位合計值最低，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，如優採廠商僅一家，且經採購評審小組過半數決定符合需要者，義務採購單位應優先與該優採廠商議價。
2.優採廠商有二家以上者，義務採購單位應依總評分名次或序位合計值名次，依序與該優採廠商議價；二家以上總評分名次或序位合計值名次相同者，擇配分最高之評審項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；配分最高之評選項目有二項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
三、訂有底價決標者，準用前款規定辦理；合於招標文件規定之投標廠商標價超過底價時，依政府採購法第五十三條第二項規定辦理。