Child and Juvenile Welfare and Rights Protection Act Article 26-1
A person shall not serve as a family childcare service provider if they have any of the following circumstances:1. Have been subject to a deferred prosecution or a guilty judgment for offenses under Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act, Article 25 of the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act, the Child and Youth Sexual Transaction Prevention Act, or the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act. However, this does not apply to persons under eighteen years of age who have committed an offense under Article 227 of the Criminal Code.2. Have been subject to a deferred prosecution or a guilty judgment for offenses under the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act.3. Have committed any of the acts specified in the Subparagraphs of Article 49, as verified by relevant authorities.4. Have engaged in illegal or improper conduct, the circumstances of which significantly affect the rights and interests of the children being cared for, as verified by the competent authority.5. There are objective facts indicating a risk of harming children, and the special municipality or county (city) competent authority determines that they cannot perform their duties.6. Are under guardianship or assistant guardianship, and such declaration has not been revoked.7. Have committed a domestic violence offense and are within five years from the date of deferred prosecution or guilty judgment.The determination under Subparagraph 5 of the preceding paragraph shall be made by a group formed by the special municipality or county (city) competent authority, inviting relevant specialist physicians, child and juvenile welfare experts, and other relevant scholars and experts.After the reason for Subparagraph 5 of Paragraph 1 disappears, one may still apply to serve as a family childcare service provider in accordance with this Act.If any of the circumstances in Paragraph 1 apply, the special municipality or county (city) competent authority shall order the person to cease providing services and forcibly refer the children being cared for. If registration has been completed, their registration shall be revoked.
中文原文 兒童及少年福利與權益保障法第26-1條
有下列情事之一，不得擔任居家式托育服務提供者：
一、曾犯性侵害犯罪防治法第二條第一項之罪、性騷擾防治法第二十五條之罪、兒童及少年性交易防制條例之罪、兒童及少年性剝削防制條例之罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定。
但未滿十八歲之人，犯刑法第二百二十七條之罪者，不在此限。
二、曾犯毒品危害防制條例之罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定。
三、有第四十九條各款所定行為之一，經有關機關查證屬實。
四、行為違法或不當，其情節影響收托兒童權益重大，經主管機關查證屬實。
五、有客觀事實認有傷害兒童之虞，經直轄市、縣（市）主管機關認定不能執行業務。
六、受監護或輔助宣告，尚未撤銷。
七、曾犯家庭暴力罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定之日起五年內。
前項第五款之認定，應由直轄市、縣（市）主管機關邀請相關專科醫師、兒童少年福利及其他相關學者專家組成小組為之。
第一項第五款原因消失後，仍得依本法規定申請擔任居家式托育服務提供者。
有第一項各款情事之一者，直轄市、縣（市）主管機關應命其停止服務，並強制轉介其收托之兒童。
已完成登記者，廢止其登記。
一、曾犯性侵害犯罪防治法第二條第一項之罪、性騷擾防治法第二十五條之罪、兒童及少年性交易防制條例之罪、兒童及少年性剝削防制條例之罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定。
但未滿十八歲之人，犯刑法第二百二十七條之罪者，不在此限。
二、曾犯毒品危害防制條例之罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定。
三、有第四十九條各款所定行為之一，經有關機關查證屬實。
四、行為違法或不當，其情節影響收托兒童權益重大，經主管機關查證屬實。
五、有客觀事實認有傷害兒童之虞，經直轄市、縣（市）主管機關認定不能執行業務。
六、受監護或輔助宣告，尚未撤銷。
七、曾犯家庭暴力罪，經緩起訴處分或有罪判決確定之日起五年內。
前項第五款之認定，應由直轄市、縣（市）主管機關邀請相關專科醫師、兒童少年福利及其他相關學者專家組成小組為之。
第一項第五款原因消失後，仍得依本法規定申請擔任居家式托育服務提供者。
有第一項各款情事之一者，直轄市、縣（市）主管機關應命其停止服務，並強制轉介其收托之兒童。
已完成登記者，廢止其登記。