Mental Health Act Article 66
During the period of an emergency placement, mandatory hospitalization, or mandatory community treatment, the severe patients or their protectors may petition the court for a ruling to cease the emergency placement, mandatory hospitalization, or mandatory community treatment.When the petition and appeal of the affairs referred to in the preceding Paragraph are filed by the severe patients or their protectors, they shall be exempt from court cost, and the provisions provided by Paragraph 4 of Article 77-23 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis.Public interest organizations related to patient rights and interests advocacy, which are recognized by the central competent authority, may conduct case supervision on matters of mandatory hospitalization, mandatory community treatment, and emergency placement. If said organizations discover any inappropriate circumstances, they shall immediately notify the relevant competent authorities to take improvement measures.Considering the autonomy, equality, and interests in the protection of severe patients, said organizations may petition the court for a ruling to cease mandatory hospitalization, mandatory community treatment, or emergency placement.
中文原文 精神衛生法第66條
緊急安置、強制住院或強制社區治療期間,嚴重病人或其保護人得向法院聲請裁定停止緊急安置、強制住院或強制社區治療。
前項事件之聲請及抗告由嚴重病人或保護人提出者,免徵裁判費並準用民事訴訟法第七十七條之二十三第四項規定。
經中央主管機關認可之病人權益促進相關公益團體,得就強制住院、強制社區治療及緊急安置事項進行個案監督;其發現不妥情事時,應即通知各該主管機關採取改善措施,並得基於嚴重病人自主、平等及利益保障之考量,向法院聲請裁定停止強制住院、強制社區治療或緊急安置。
前項事件之聲請及抗告由嚴重病人或保護人提出者,免徵裁判費並準用民事訴訟法第七十七條之二十三第四項規定。
經中央主管機關認可之病人權益促進相關公益團體,得就強制住院、強制社區治療及緊急安置事項進行個案監督;其發現不妥情事時,應即通知各該主管機關採取改善措施,並得基於嚴重病人自主、平等及利益保障之考量,向法院聲請裁定停止強制住院、強制社區治療或緊急安置。