Enforcement Rules of the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act Article 20
The following circumstances are considered “necessary to re-investigate” as defined in Paragraph 1, Article 16 of the Act:1. There are significant flaws in the investigation procedure;2. New evidence or facts that can affect the original investigation findings; and3. Other reasons that the Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee deems necessary for a re-investigation.The re-investigation referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be completed within two months. If necessary, the length of the investigation may be extended by another one month, and the concerned parties must be informed.
中文原文 性騷擾防治法施行細則第20條
本法第十六條第一項所定有必要重行調查者，指下列情形之一：
一、調查程序有重大瑕疵。
二、有足以影響原調查認定之新事實、新證據。
三、其他性騷擾防治審議會認有必要重行調查之原因。
前項重行調查應於二個月內調查完成；必要時，得延長一個月，並通知當事人。
一、調查程序有重大瑕疵。
二、有足以影響原調查認定之新事實、新證據。
三、其他性騷擾防治審議會認有必要重行調查之原因。
前項重行調查應於二個月內調查完成；必要時，得延長一個月，並通知當事人。