Enforcement Rules for the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act Article 8
The competent regulatory authority may, in accordance with the Act, issue administrative dispositions against internet service providers and transmit them in electronic format over the internet to the publicly disclosed electronic mail or electronic form designated by the internet service provider for notification, and such transmission shall be deemed as served.The electronic document mentioned in the preceding paragraph, upon being transmitted by the competent regulatory authority to the publicly disclosed electronic mail or electronic form designated by the internet service provider, shall take effect as having been duly served, notified, or made known in accordance with the law after one working day upon such transmission. However, in any of the following circumstances are not subject to this time limit:1. When the electronic document has been transmitted but has not entered the internet operators' publicly disclosed or designated email or electronic forms.2. When the electronic document has entered the internet operators' publicly disclosed or designated email or electronic forms after one working day but the internet operators provide an explanation that they cannot read it.3. When the internet operators can prove that the electronic document entered their publicly disclosed or designated email or electronic forms at an earlier or later time.In the event of a dispute regarding the circumstances described in Subparagraph 1 of the proviso in the preceding paragraph, it shall be proven by the competent regulatory authority. If the competent regulatory authority cannot provide proof, the electronic document shall be redelivered, notified, or made known in an appropriate manner.In the circumstances described in Subparagraph 2 of the proviso in Paragraph 2, the competent regulatory authority shall redeliver, notify, or make it known in an appropriate manner.In the circumstances described in Subparagraph 3 of the proviso in Paragraph 2, the effectiveness of delivery, notification, or making it known shall occur based on the earlier or later time point as proven by the internet operator, in accordance with the law.
中文原文 性侵害犯罪防治法施行細則第8條
目的事業主管機關對網路業者依本法作成之行政處分，得以電子文件利用網際網路之方式，傳送至網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單，以為送達。
前項電子文件，由目的事業主管機關傳送至網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日，發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。
但有下列情形之一者，不在此限：
一、電子文件已傳送而未進入網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單。
二、電子文件已進入網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日，網路業者釋明其無法閱讀。
三、網路業者證明電子文件於較早或較晚之時點進入其公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單。
前項但書第一款情形有爭議時，由目的事業主管機關證明；目的事業主管機關不能證明者，應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第二款情形，目的事業主管機關應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第三款情形，依網路業者證明較早或較晚之時點，發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。
前項電子文件，由目的事業主管機關傳送至網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日，發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。
但有下列情形之一者，不在此限：
一、電子文件已傳送而未進入網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單。
二、電子文件已進入網路業者公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單後一工作日，網路業者釋明其無法閱讀。
三、網路業者證明電子文件於較早或較晚之時點進入其公開揭示或指定之電子郵件、電子表單。
前項但書第一款情形有爭議時，由目的事業主管機關證明；目的事業主管機關不能證明者，應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第二款情形，目的事業主管機關應另以適當之方式重行送達、通知或使其知悉。
第二項但書第三款情形，依網路業者證明較早或較晚之時點，發生依法送達、通知或使其知悉之效力。