Regulations for Arbitration on Labor-Management Disputes Article 14
In case that parties to a dispute regard that a member of arbitration committee has the causes for recusal as prescribed in Paragraphs 1 and 2 to Article 32 of the Act, they may apply that member to recuse.The application referred to in the preceding paragraph shall provide and submit reasons and facts to the concerned competent authority with appropriate explanation. For the member whom the application for recusal is filed with, he/she may offer a written opinion toward the application.The competent authority shall take an appropriate action in response to the application within ten days referred to in Paragraph 1 unless there is a justifiable reason exists.When a member of the arbitration committee is filed with the application for recusal, the arbitration procedure shall be suspended before the competent authority makes the decision to approve or reject the application. However, if an urgent circumstance occurs, the competent authority shall take necessary action.In case that a member of arbitration committee has the causes prescribed in Paragraphs 1 and 2 to Article 32 of the Act and still refuses to recuse, and the parties to the dispute have not filed the application for recusal, the competent authority shall take ex officio action and order him/her to recuse.
中文原文 勞資爭議仲裁辦法第14條
勞資爭議當事人認為仲裁委員有本法第三十二條第一項、第二項所定迴避事由時,得申請仲裁委員迴避。
前項申請應舉其原因及事實,向各該主管機關為之,並為適當之釋明;被申請迴避之仲裁委員對於該申請得提出意見書。
第一項之申請,除有正當理由外,主管機關應於十日內為適當之處置。
被申請迴避之仲裁委員於主管機關就該申請事件為准許或駁回之決定前,應停止仲裁程序。
但有急迫情形,仍應為必要處置。
仲裁委員有本法第三十二條第一項、第二項所定迴避事由不自行迴避,而未經當事人申請迴避者,應由主管機關依職權命其迴避。
前項申請應舉其原因及事實,向各該主管機關為之,並為適當之釋明;被申請迴避之仲裁委員對於該申請得提出意見書。
第一項之申請,除有正當理由外,主管機關應於十日內為適當之處置。
被申請迴避之仲裁委員於主管機關就該申請事件為准許或駁回之決定前,應停止仲裁程序。
但有急迫情形,仍應為必要處置。
仲裁委員有本法第三十二條第一項、第二項所定迴避事由不自行迴避,而未經當事人申請迴避者,應由主管機關依職權命其迴避。