Enforcement Rules of the Patent Act Article 26

The priority document to be submitted pursuant to Paragraph 2, Article 29 of the Act shall be the certified copy.In the event that the priority document submitted by the applicant within the time limit prescribed under Paragraph 2, Article 29 of the Act is a photocopy, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify the applicant to submit the certified copy thereof within specified time limit; where such submission is not made within the specified time limit or the submission is still incomplete, the priority claim is deemed not to have been claimed pursuant to Paragraph 3, Article 29 of the Act. However, in the event that the certified priority document has already been submitted to the Specific Patent Agency, a photocopy specifying the number of the patent application to which the certified priority document appends may be submitted as a substitute.In the event that the priority document referred to in Paragraph 1 has been exchanged between the Specific Patent Agency and the receiving patent authority of the country or the WTO member by means of electronic communication, the priority document is deemed to have been submitted by the applicant.The certified copy referred to in Paragraph 1 may be replaced with the electronic version thereof in compliance with the requirement of the Specific Patent Agency; an explanation that this electronic version is identical to the certified copy shall be made.
中文原文 專利法施行細則第26條
依本法第二十九條第二項規定檢送之優先權證明文件應為正本。
申請人於本法第二十九條第二項規定期間內檢送之優先權證明文件為影本者,專利專責機關應通知申請人限期補正與該影本為同一文件之正本;屆期未補正或補正仍不齊備者,依本法第二十九條第三項規定,視為未主張優先權。
但其正本已向專利專責機關提出者,得以載明正本所依附案號之影本代之。
第一項優先權證明文件,經專利專責機關與該國家或世界貿易組織會員之專利受理機關已為電子交換者,視為申請人已提出。
第一項規定之正本,得以專利專責機關規定之電子檔代之,並應釋明其與正本相符。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.